Mark,
What does it mean if SEL0002 at acpi0 not configured does not show up
when you boot? I haven't tried it yet, but I don't expect that it will
print out this message.
Thanks,
Chase
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Authentication-Results:
> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com;
> dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>
>Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have
>on whether or not the HID is found by the match function?
This is a body of source code that changes rapidly.
Makes perfect sense. Thanks for all the help. I will make sure that we
are using release. Is there any other reason you could think of why
match wouldn't work if SEL0002 shows up in the DSDT table?
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 4 May
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:00:03 -0500
> From: Chase Davis
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have
> on whether or not the HID is found by the match function?
Because the code that the HID matching depends on was reworked
after 5.9 was
Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have
on whether or not the HID is found by the match function?
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:41:18 -0500
>> From: Chase Davis
>>
>>
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:41:18 -0500
> From: Chase Davis
>
> It looks like other devices have: Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0501")
> instead of: Name (_HID, "SEL0002")
>
> I'm not sure what the significance of EisaId is, but it doesn't show
> up for our device.
Shouldn't be
It looks like other devices have: Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0501")
instead of: Name (_HID, "SEL0002")
I'm not sure what the significance of EisaId is, but it doesn't show
up for our device.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Chase Davis wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Yes I think that it is
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:26:15AM -0500, Chase Davis wrote:
> This was added to GENERIC:
>
> sel* at acpi?
>
> and these four lines were added to files.acpi:
> # SEL embedded controller
> device sel
> attach sel at acpi with sel_acpi
> file dev/acpi/sel_acpi.c sel_acpi
>
> With SEL0002 being