Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-13 Thread Chase Davis
Mark, What does it mean if SEL0002 at acpi0 not configured does not show up when you boot? I haven't tried it yet, but I don't expect that it will print out this message. Thanks, Chase On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Authentication-Results:

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; > dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; >

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Theo de Raadt
>Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have >on whether or not the HID is found by the match function? This is a body of source code that changes rapidly.

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Chase Davis
Makes perfect sense. Thanks for all the help. I will make sure that we are using release. Is there any other reason you could think of why match wouldn't work if SEL0002 shows up in the DSDT table? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Wed, 4 May

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:00:03 -0500 > From: Chase Davis > > Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have > on whether or not the HID is found by the match function? Because the code that the HID matching depends on was reworked after 5.9 was

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Chase Davis
Forgive my ignorance, but what bearing does -release and -current have on whether or not the HID is found by the match function? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:41:18 -0500 >> From: Chase Davis >> >>

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:41:18 -0500 > From: Chase Davis > > It looks like other devices have: Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0501") > instead of: Name (_HID, "SEL0002") > > I'm not sure what the significance of EisaId is, but it doesn't show > up for our device. Shouldn't be

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Chase Davis
It looks like other devices have: Name (_HID, EisaId ("PNP0501") instead of: Name (_HID, "SEL0002") I'm not sure what the significance of EisaId is, but it doesn't show up for our device. On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Chase Davis wrote: > Mike, > > Yes I think that it is

Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware

2016-05-04 Thread Mike Larkin
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:26:15AM -0500, Chase Davis wrote: > This was added to GENERIC: > > sel* at acpi? > > and these four lines were added to files.acpi: > # SEL embedded controller > device sel > attach sel at acpi with sel_acpi > file dev/acpi/sel_acpi.c sel_acpi > > With SEL0002 being