Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org writes:
On 2013/03/14 15:37, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
PS: are there people already working on a sendmail port?
Not that I know of, but I think it is wanted. Having it in ports will
actually make it easier for certain uses (e.g. people using it
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:59:22PM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
Hi,
while the various README files are helpful, not everyone has the bat
book at hand for more complex questions. Here's a diff to update the
doc/op/Makefile and make it useful to people who have groff installed.
Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk writes:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:59:22PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Hi,
while the various README files are helpful, not everyone has the bat
book at hand for more complex questions. Here's a diff to update the
doc/op/Makefile and make it
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:37:25PM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
OK, perhaps should I have taken more time to explain my thinking:
my understanding was indeed that those had been on-purpose unlinked from
the build, and I do not suggest re-linking them. My point was just to
make
On 2013/03/14 15:37, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
PS: are there people already working on a sendmail port?
Not that I know of, but I think it is wanted. Having it in ports will
actually make it easier for certain uses (e.g. people using it with SASL
and/or LDAP). And of course any groff-based
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:49:01PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
sorry, i obviously didn;t read the diff well enough. i agree at least
mail/README should be fixed. i'll see what millert thinks.
ok, diff committed (except for the Revision strings, which cvs would
just re-expand);
jmc
