On 2014-04-19, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
we're in the same boat here - it's ust that I don't care too much
either way (both of us) doesn't really help in taking a decision :/
Well, in that case I suggest that we remove this hack from all
drivers that have it. A network
so, what are we doing with this now?
I still want to hide in_cksum_phdr() and kill in_cksum_addword() so that
nobody ever uses that sh*t again.
yes, sk loses is half-baked cksum offload support with this, as
discussed before.
as naddy pointed out there are (at least) two private copies of
* David Higgs hig...@gmail.com [2014-01-25 18:25]:
On Jan 25, 2014, at 12:48 AM, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
* Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de [2014-01-24 05:50]:
i need this tested on an
On 01/24/2014 02:09 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com [2014-01-24 17:48]:
Are people still using sk, gem, or hme (!) in pps performance critical
situations?
doesn't make sense to do so, and hasn't in a long time...
Performance critical? Well, given the pathetic
* Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de [2014-01-24 05:50]:
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
this gets rif od a slight little bit more.
Index: netinet/in.h
===
RCS file:
Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
[Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to ip_output.c and
remove its only other user sk_rxcsum().]
This is an instance of a very rudimentary RX checksumming engine
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 16:27, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
[Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to ip_output.c and
remove its only other user sk_rxcsum().]
* Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com [2014-01-24 17:48]:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 16:27, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
[Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
* Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de [2014-01-24 05:50]:
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
this gets rif od a slight little bit more.
Resurrected an old box, kernel
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
Index: dev/pci/if_sk.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_sk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.167
diff -u -p -r1.167 if_sk.c
--- dev/pci/if_sk.c 28 Dec 2013 03:36:25
10 matches
Mail list logo