> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 19:25:56 +0100
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> Am Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:59:05AM +0100 schrieb Jan Klemkow:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:35:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > My comments are about the "text name", which goes into every kernel
> > > anyone compiles.
> >
Am Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:59:05AM +0100 schrieb Jan Klemkow:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:35:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > My comments are about the "text name", which goes into every kernel
> > anyone compiles.
> >
> > It should be as short as possible.
>
> Sorry, I missed that point.
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:35:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> My comments are about the "text name", which goes into every kernel
> anyone compiles.
>
> It should be as short as possible.
Sorry, I missed that point.
> But the reason why 10G is incorrect is because surely the port can
>
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:39:42PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > +product INTEL X710_10G_SFP_2 0x104e X710 10G SFP+
>
> You only need:
>
> X710 SFP+
>
> Adding 10G is incorrect.
OK?
Thanks,
Jan
Index: if_ixl.c
===
RCS file:
Hi,
This diff attaches the Intel x710 10G SFP+ NIC in ixl(4).
ixl2 at pci11 dev 0 function 2 "Intel X710 10G SFP+" rev 0x02: port 1, FW
8.1.63299 API 1.12, msix, 8 queues, address 3c:ec:ef:1f:c3:bc
ixl3 at pci11 dev 0 function 3 "Intel X710 10G SFP+" rev 0x02: port 3, FW
8.1.63299 API 1.12,
