Re: patch: tedu sccs support

2014-11-20 Thread Tobias Stoeckmann
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:02:33PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Are we still tracking upstream patch in any way? I think we've > diverged in a few places, but there still is an upstream, yes? I don't think so. Looking at the past, the first version was written by Larry Wall who licensed it to FSF

Re: patch: tedu sccs support

2014-11-19 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 19:25, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote: > Hi, > > as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to > support SCCS files anymore. I also remember that we removed the > SCCS IDs from source files so... > > Time to tedu sccs? > Are we still tracking upstream pa

Re: patch: tedu sccs support

2014-11-19 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Tobias, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:25:47PM +0100: > as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to > support SCCS files anymore. I also remember that we removed the > SCCS IDs from source files so... I look at CSRG SCCS files fairly often and wou

patch: tedu sccs support

2014-11-19 Thread Tobias Stoeckmann
Hi, as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to support SCCS files anymore. I also remember that we removed the SCCS IDs from source files so... Time to tedu sccs? Tobias Index: common.h === RCS file: /cv