On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 01:08:35PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:01:41AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Why u_char instead of int? The errors in that list are used in errno which
> > is an int. So my usual feeling is to use the type which is naturally used
> > and
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:01:41AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Why u_char instead of int? The errors in that list are used in errno which
> is an int. So my usual feeling is to use the type which is naturally used
> and don't try to optimize for space.
Basically I want to have it the same for
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:53:59PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > My goal is to get in6_pcb and in_pcb in sync.
> >
> > Let's make both inetctlerrmap and inet6ctlerrmap u_char. That is
> > what FreeBSD does. There it is also
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 09:53:59PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> My goal is to get in6_pcb and in_pcb in sync.
>
> Let's make both inetctlerrmap and inet6ctlerrmap u_char. That is
> what FreeBSD does. There it is also in in6?_input.c.
>
> FreeBSD and NetBSD have the declaration in
Hi,
My goal is to get in6_pcb and in_pcb in sync.
Let's make both inetctlerrmap and inet6ctlerrmap u_char. That is
what FreeBSD does. There it is also in in6?_input.c.
FreeBSD and NetBSD have the declaration in in6?_var.h, we have it
in in6?.h, but I don't bother enough to move it.
ok?
