Re: route(8): -n means numeric for default too

2019-05-11 Thread Denis Fondras
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 01:15:16PM -0400, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > What is wrong with "default"? Why is "0.0.0.0/0" and "::/0" better? > Nothing wrong per-se. I was comparing the output of "bgpctl sh fib" and "route show" when I noticed this.

Re: route(8): -n means numeric for default too

2019-05-11 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 07:03:34PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote: > When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route. I use -n to avoid DNS lookups. "default" does not do that. So I do not see the benefit of this change. It has been that way for ever without harm. New behavior

route(8): -n means numeric for default too

2019-05-11 Thread Denis Fondras
When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route. Before : [denis@jig-ai] route -n show -inet6 Routing tables Internet6: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface default2a00:6060:1::1