observed no issue, still running w/ your diff
April 23, 2020 1:10 PM, "Eric Faurot" wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:08:48AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> April 21, 2020 4:28 AM, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:01:31 +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
>>
>> There has bee
Hey,
i let this patch run on one of our mailservers and it worked as
expected. I did not notice any issues with it. But that server has a low
volume of mails (around 8000 a day), so it is probobly not that helpful
for you.
Greetings
Leo
Am 21.04.2020 um 04:28 schrieb Todd C. Miller:
This lo
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:08:48AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> April 21, 2020 4:28 AM, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:01:31 +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
> >
> >> There has been a discussion a while ago about the issue of trailing CR
> >> in smtp lines (https://marc.info/?
April 21, 2020 4:28 AM, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:01:31 +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
>
>> There has been a discussion a while ago about the issue of trailing CR
>> in smtp lines (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=156890805128121&w=2).
>>
>> It is agreed that stripping an o
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:01:31 +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
> There has been a discussion a while ago about the issue of trailing CR
> in smtp lines (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=156890805128121&w=2).
>
> It is agreed that stripping an optional CR at io level is a problem
> because the informati
Hi,
There has been a discussion a while ago about the issue of trailing CR
in smtp lines (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=156890805128121&w=2).
It is agreed that stripping an optional CR at io level is a problem
because the information is lost and there is no way to take a specific
action at
