On 10/15/10 10:50, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball has been uploaded yesterday, it contains the fixes eric@ wrote
for the issues reported on asr.
For now, only two issues have been reported on smtpd:
1- smtpd does not catch up changes to /etc/resolv.conf;
2- smtpd does not look
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball with all reported issues fixed is available at:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/smtpd-asyncdns.tar.gz
smtpd now catches changes in /etc/resolv.conf and should work fine with
inet6 records.
I have
On 10/30/10 17:23, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball with all reported issues fixed is available at:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/smtpd-asyncdns.tar.gz
smtpd now catches changes in /etc/resolv.conf and should
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:28:42PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
It was a typo indeed, tarball has been updated and also contains a fix for
a crash experienced by todd@ when using relay via
Gilles
I had a look at the pack.c file where the DNS compression is being handled.
It looks good to me.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
I had a look at the pack.c file where the DNS compression is being handled.
It looks good to me. But I have one concern that needs to be confirmed.
In function dname_expand() on lines:
54 ptr =
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:20:06PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
this dns code has a serious flaw. you use arc4random to allocate request
IDs. this is a bad decision, as you actually want a non-repeating
property.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:47:26PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Dear tech@,
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
As of today, smtpd implements non-blocking lookups through a fork+imsg hack,
creating a socketpair() and a new
Dear tech@,
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
As of today, smtpd implements non-blocking lookups through a fork+imsg hack,
creating a socketpair() and a new process for each lookup. It kind of worked
ok but recently a bug
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org wrote:
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
Why not use the evdns resolver in libevent? If you're already using
libevent, wouldn't that be a good fit? DNS
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org wrote:
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
Why not use the evdns resolver in libevent? If you're already using
libevent, wouldn't that be a good fit?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org
wrote:
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to
do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
Why not use the evdns resolver in
On 10/14/10 17:06, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Gilles Chehadegil...@openbsd.org wrote:
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
Why not use the evdns resolver in libevent? If you're already using
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
we don't have evdns in our libevent and I'm pretty confident it's not going
to happen any time soon given how many times I heard no fucking way by
different hackers :p
In that case, here's some more constructive feedback
OS X routed all dns lookups to a daemon (both unicast and multicast),
they can do local cashing and probably async lookups, maybe thats a
future solution ?
just my two cents.
On 10/14/10 17:30, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Gilles Chehadegil...@poolp.org wrote:
we don't have evdns in our libevent and I'm pretty confident it's not going
to happen any time soon given how many times I heard no fucking way by
different hackers :p
In
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org wrote:
Dear tech@,
eric@ has written an (awesome :p) asynchronous resolver that allows us to do
non-blocking DNS lookups.
this dns code has a serious flaw. you use arc4random to allocate request
IDs. this is a bad decision,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
this dns code has a serious flaw. you use arc4random to allocate request
IDs. this is a bad decision, as you actually want a non-repeating
property.
Why? Each query transmission uses a newly allocated socket with
17 matches
Mail list logo
