> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:23, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:20:37PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:18, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>>>
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:05, Dave Voutila wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:20:37PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:18, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> >>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:05, Dave Voutila wrote:
> >>> Otto Moerbeek writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:18, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:05, Dave Voutila wrote:
>>> Otto Moerbeek writes:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:51:19AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek writes:
>> On
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:05, Dave Voutila wrote:
> > Otto Moerbeek writes:
> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:51:19AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
> >>> Otto Moerbeek writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 15:05, Dave Voutila wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:51:19AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>>> Otto Moerbeek writes:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:59:17PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > I'm more familiar with the vmd(8) codebase than any ffs stuff, but I
> > > don't think the issue is the base image being r/w.
> >
> > AFAIKS, the issue is that if you start a vm modifying the base because it
> > uses it as a
Otto Moerbeek writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:51:19AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>
>>
>> Otto Moerbeek writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>> Created a fresh
> > I'm more familiar with the vmd(8) codebase than any ffs stuff, but I
> > don't think the issue is the base image being r/w.
>
> AFAIKS, the issue is that if you start a vm modifying the base because it
> uses it as a regular image, that r/o open for the other vms does not
> matter a lot,
vmd
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:51:19AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
>
> Otto Moerbeek writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new
Otto Moerbeek writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
>> >>> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs per cycle and
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 14:30, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>>
> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 14:27, Bryan Steele wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>>
> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >>> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
> >>> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs per cycle and waiting
> >>> 240 seconds
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >>> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
> >>> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs per cycle and waiting
> >>> 240 seconds after
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>>> Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
>>> Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs per cycle and waiting 240
>>> seconds after each cycle.
>>> Similar to the staggered start based on the amount
> > Created a fresh install qcow2 image and derived 35 new VMs from it.
> > Then I started all the VMs in four cycles, 10 VMs per cycle and waiting 240
> > seconds after each cycle.
> > Similar to the staggered start based on the amount of CPUs.
> For me this is not enough info to even try to
> On 22 Mar 2021, at 13:08, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:34:25AM +0100, Mischa wrote:
>
>>> On 21 Mar 2021, at 02:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:15:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:34:25AM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > On 21 Mar 2021, at 02:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:15:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had the same
> On 21 Mar 2021, at 02:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:15:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
I had the same issue a few days ago a server hardware of mine. I just
ran 'cvs
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:15:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had the same issue a few days ago a server hardware of mine. I just
> > > ran 'cvs up'. So, it looks like a generic bug in FFS and
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:15:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had the same issue a few days ago a server hardware of mine. I just
> > ran 'cvs up'. So, it looks like a generic bug in FFS and not related to
> > vmm.
>
> This panic
Hi,
I had the same issue a few days ago a server hardware of mine. I just
ran 'cvs up'. So, it looks like a generic bug in FFS and not related to
vmm.
OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #396: Thu Mar 11 19:15:56 MST 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
On 2021/03/19 17:05, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had the same issue a few days ago a server hardware of mine. I just
> ran 'cvs up'. So, it looks like a generic bug in FFS and not related to
> vmm.
This panic generally relates to filesystem corruption. If fsck doesn't
help then recreating
> On 16 Mar 2021, at 21:17, Mischa wrote:
> On 13 Mar at 09:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:08:52AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
On 10 Mar at 18:59, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM
On 13 Mar at 09:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:08:52AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > On 10 Mar at 18:59, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > >
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 12:08:52AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > On 10 Mar at 18:59, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Currently I am running 6.9-beta on one
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> On 10 Mar at 18:59, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Currently I am running 6.9-beta on one of my hosts to test
> > > veb(4)/vport(4).
> > >
> > > root@server14:~ #
On 10 Mar at 18:59, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently I am running 6.9-beta on one of my hosts to test veb(4)/vport(4).
> >
> > root@server14:~ # sysctl kern.version
> > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #385: Mon
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Mischa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Currently I am running 6.9-beta on one of my hosts to test veb(4)/vport(4).
>
> root@server14:~ # sysctl kern.version
> kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #385: Mon Mar 8 12:57:12 MST 2021
>
Hi All,
Currently I am running 6.9-beta on one of my hosts to test veb(4)/vport(4).
root@server14:~ # sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #385: Mon Mar 8 12:57:12 MST 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
On order to add some
30 matches
Mail list logo
