Re: xonly status

2023-01-29 Thread Greg Steuck
"Theo de Raadt" writes: ... removed the comprehensive summary of the effort. > The major application problems have been reasonably isolated, and after > 3 weeks they are mostly handled, or we know where the remaining problems > lie: > > - libcrypto assembly functions with incorrect data

Re: xonly status

2023-01-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
The two main test programs being used for xonly assessment, as attachments. They will eventually head towards src/regress but for now, people can play with them. #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(int argc, char

xonly status

2023-01-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
We've made good progress in the xonly effort so here's a small summary. architectures crossed over completely arm64 - X bit without implied R in mmu riscv64 - X bit without implied R in mmu amd64 - using hardware 'PKU' feature powerpc64 - using feature similar to