Re: vlan vlandev fix

2011-02-17 Thread Peter Hessler
This fixes the breakage I saw with a carp child. This also works with a bridge child. The routing socket sees the interface status changes, so things that care get notified. OK. On 2011 Feb 16 (Wed) at 14:27:18 +0100 (+0100), Reyk Floeter wrote: :Hi! : :My previous change to vlan(4) allows to

Re: vlan vlandev fix

2011-02-17 Thread Camiel Dobbelaar
On 16-2-2011 14:27, Reyk Floeter wrote: My previous change to vlan(4) allows to change the vlandev and vlan id on-the-fly without re-creating the vlan interface. I hesitated to ask this simple question, because I might be overlooking something, but what exactly is the advantage over just using

Re: vlan vlandev fix

2011-02-17 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2011 Feb 17 (Thu) at 12:45:35 +0100 (+0100), Camiel Dobbelaar wrote: :On 16-2-2011 14:27, Reyk Floeter wrote: : My previous change to vlan(4) allows to change the vlandev and vlan id : on-the-fly without re-creating the vlan interface. : :I hesitated to ask this simple question, because I might

Re: vlan vlandev fix

2011-02-17 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:45:35PM +0100, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote: On 16-2-2011 14:27, Reyk Floeter wrote: My previous change to vlan(4) allows to change the vlandev and vlan id on-the-fly without re-creating the vlan interface. I hesitated to ask this simple question, because I might be

pf doesn't rewrite source address for the icmp errors with rdr-to

2011-02-17 Thread Mike Belopuhov
in the simple setup, like the one described in the pr 6564, pf won't rewrite source address for the icmp errors (like destination unreachable) when doing rdr-to. this diff fixes issue for me and a pr originator. comments? do we want to put it into 4.9? Index: pf.c

Re: tcpbench udp support + libevent.

2011-02-17 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 14 February 2011 18:36, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: poll() or the other mechanisms to check if a socket is writable or not have no way to see if a ENOBUF error will be returned on the write. The problem is that the UDP sendbuffer is always empty (it is only used to copy

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

2011-02-17 Thread Ɓukasz Czarniecki
On 17.02.2011 16:22, Mike Belopuhov wrote: Lukasz has tested the patch below and it works fine for him. I don't have the hardware myself, so I'm not going to push it for the release, but if someone thinks it's worth it, please speak up. Here are some numbers: 4.8 # time tar xzf ./sys.tar.gz

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

2011-02-17 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:25 +0100, Lukasz Czarniecki wrote: Hi I've bought a Dell R310 with H200 raid controller reported in dmesg as: Symbios Logic SAS2008. It uses mpii driver and has two hard drives configured in RAID 1. Now it seems to work fine but i still have a problem with its

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

2011-02-17 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:22:54PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:25 +0100, Lukasz Czarniecki wrote: Hi I've bought a Dell R310 with H200 raid controller reported in dmesg as: Symbios Logic SAS2008. It uses mpii driver and has two hard drives configured in RAID

Re: Important bge(4) diff to test!

2011-02-17 Thread Brynet
Robert wrote: Hello, The following diff is really important because on some machines bge(4) gets detached because of ASPM. The following diff is also in the latest snapshots but you can also compile a kernel with it. So if you have a bge(4) please update/compile a kernel and get back to me

Re: fix possible NULL deref in sys/dev/usb/uhub.c

2011-02-17 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Applied on amd64 -current: uhub7 at uhub4 port 1 ALCOR Generic USB Hub rev 1.10/3.14 addr 2 Works fine. //Logan C-x-C-c

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

2011-02-17 Thread David Gwynne
this diff implements the disk cache ioctl handling in mpii so sd(4) can drive the change rather than have mpii(4) whack everything. modelled on the same functionality in mpi(4) and mikeb's code... could someone test this please? Index: mpii.c

Re: Important bge(4) diff to test!

2011-02-17 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote: No regression here, although I'm not sure if my controller is capable of ASPM. bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM57780 rev 0x01, BCM57780 A1 (0x57780001): apic 4 int 16 (irq 7), address 88:ae:1d:0e:3a:76 Same here. No