fwiw, this is what i have in my tree for some time now:
Index: syslogd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.104
diff -u -p -u -r1.104 syslogd.c
--- syslogd.c 12 Jul 2011 11:28:31 -
Hello,
I run OpenBSD 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386 for a while at home (wifi/router), and
since the release no reboot nor problem.
The Box is connected to a cable modem router that gives a public ip address
over dhcp or a local one if the line is cut.
So sometimes my egress is 192.168.100.1 sometimes it
On 2013/02/07 08:29, sven falempin wrote:
Hello,
I run OpenBSD 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386 for a while at home (wifi/router), and
since the release no reboot nor problem.
The Box is connected to a cable modem router that gives a public ip address
over dhcp or a local one if the line is cut.
So
On 2013 Feb 07 (Thu) at 13:44:22 + (+), Stuart Henderson wrote:
:On 2013/02/07 08:29, sven falempin wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I run OpenBSD 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386 for a while at home (wifi/router), and
: since the release no reboot nor problem.
: The Box is connected to a cable modem router that
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote:
On 2013 Feb 07 (Thu) at 13:44:22 + (+), Stuart Henderson wrote:
:On 2013/02/07 08:29, sven falempin wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I run OpenBSD 5.2 GENERIC#278 i386 for a while at home (wifi/router),
and
: since the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:26:47AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:04:30 -0500
From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com
To a certain extent this seems to make rsu(3) work a little better, but
now I am
On 2013 Feb 07 (Thu) at 09:26:03 -0500 (-0500), sven falempin wrote:
:On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote:
:
: On 2013 Feb 07 (Thu) at 13:44:22 + (+), Stuart Henderson wrote:
: :On 2013/02/07 08:29, sven falempin wrote:
: : Hello,
: :
: : I run OpenBSD
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:26:03AM -0500, sven falempin wrote:
egress, vr0 ext are all the same, arent they ?
in your case, it sounds like there would be a full overlap. In general 'egress'
is the interface group that contains the interfaces with default routes. As
long
as egress has only
On 2013/02/07 09:26, sven falempin wrote:
egress, vr0 ext are all the same, arent they ?
Probably, but you didn't give enough information to be sure.
For example if you have IPv6 via a tunnel interface (or perhaps
more importantly, if you later add it), then that will also be
in the egress
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:26:58 -0500
From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:26:47AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:04:30 -0500
From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com
To a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:44:12PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:26:58 -0500
From: Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:36:41AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:26:47AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2013/02/07 09:26, sven falempin wrote:
egress, vr0 ext are all the same, arent they ?
Probably, but you didn't give enough information to be sure.
For example if you have IPv6 via a tunnel interface (or perhaps
On 2013/02/07 10:01, sven falempin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2013/02/07 09:26, sven falempin wrote:
egress, vr0 ext are all the same, arent they ?
Probably, but you didn't give enough information to be sure.
For example if
Okay?
Index: pcidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1667
diff -u -p -r1.1667 pcidevs
--- pcidevs 17 Jan 2013 12:50:34 - 1.1667
+++ pcidevs 7 Feb 2013 16:04:35 -
@@ -1499,6
On 07/02/13(Thu) 18:06, Paul Irofti wrote:
Okay?
ok mpi@
Index: pcidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1667
diff -u -p -r1.1667 pcidevs
--- pcidevs 17 Jan 2013 12:50:34 -
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:41:12 +
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This is extremely useful as it permits carrying stacked vlans
on Alix/net5501, and also permits carrying 1500 MTU packets within
pppoe(4) using the RFC4638 support.
So with 5.3 I can drop the max-mss 1452 on my
Appears not to break my alix...
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
At least the following vr(4) devices can be configured to permit
larger MTUs.
vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 VIA RhineII-2 rev 0x51: irq 11, address
00:40:63:c0:5d:27
vr1 at pci2
On 2013/02/07 20:18, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:41:12 +
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
This is extremely useful as it permits carrying stacked vlans
on Alix/net5501, and also permits carrying 1500 MTU packets within
pppoe(4) using the RFC4638
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2013/02/07 10:01, sven falempin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2013/02/07 09:26, sven falempin wrote:
egress, vr0 ext are all the same, arent they ?
19 matches
Mail list logo
