On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:43:51AM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:43:44PM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello Adam,
> >
> >
> >
> > > It was a rainy evening here, so here's the updated pfctl diff.
> >
> > I'm sorry to hear about the rainy weather [1].
> >
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:22:15 -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> m4 links with -ly, presumably for the yyerror() function.
> But there already is a yyerror() in usr.bin/m4/expr.c, which is
> written specifically for m4. So we don't need -ly.
OK, but if you want to remove -ll as well you could do
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:52:07PM +0200, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:29:59AM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> >
> > > Hi tech@,
> > >
> > > We do not support iso7 nor pcvt encoding, so remove macro definitions
> > > and commented entries.
> >
> > If you do that, then you can
Hi tech --
m4 links with -ly, presumably for the yyerror() function.
But there already is a yyerror() in usr.bin/m4/expr.c, which is
written specifically for m4. So we don't need -ly.
OK?
~Brian
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 09:43:17PM +0200, Michal Mazurek wrote:
> There are 5 devices in /dev/. Is there any reason why just two are
> listed in the viocon.4 manpage?
>
> OK to mention them all?
>
evening.
i haven;t seen anyone pick up on this. if no one has (reasonably)
objected, please go
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:09:01PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 16:31 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > > Index: arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h
> > >
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 07:12:43PM +0300, Henri Kemppainen wrote:
> > > Nice catch, the diff reads fine to me, I'll commit later today when I
> > > have another ok from eric@
>
> > Yes, this looks correct. But, I would rather move the resume test before
> > the EOM test, to avoid touching the
> > Nice catch, the diff reads fine to me, I'll commit later today when I
> > have another ok from eric@
> Yes, this looks correct. But, I would rather move the resume test before
> the EOM test, to avoid touching the session after the transfer has been
> finalized by smtp_data_io_done().
It
Ugh! :\ You're right, and that sysctl is not allowed by pledge(2).
Please disregard this diff.
On 18:00 Fri 16 Jun , Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:53:09PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> > Hi tech@
> >
> > rebound(8)'s parent proc doesn't seem to need much permissions
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:53:09PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Hi tech@
>
> rebound(8)'s parent proc doesn't seem to need much permissions to do what it
> needs, here is the pledge for the parent for the following promises:
>
> rpath: reload the configuration at reexec time (see below)
>
Hi tech@
rebound(8)'s parent proc doesn't seem to need much permissions to do what it
needs, here is the pledge for the parent for the following promises:
rpath: reload the configuration at reexec time (see below)
proc/exec: needed to reexec itself and kill child if needed
Comments? OK?
Index:
Set the link state of wifi interfaces to DOWN at attach time
instead of leaving it as UNKNOWN which userland cannot really
make use of (e.g. dhclient interprets UNKNOWN as UP).
Link state is also reset by the ieee80211_newstate() function.
However, that function is usually called by the
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:11:29AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:05:25AM +0300, Henri Kemppainen wrote:
> > I had a little debugging session with awolk@ over at #openbsd-daily. His
> > smtpd would over time end up with hung sessions that never timeout.
> >
> > The
The HW_INITED flag has a grammatically dubious name and is unnecessary
because it duplicates the purpose of the IFF_RUNNING flag.
ok?
Index: sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_iwm.c,v
retrieving revision
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:25 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Last time I've tried uebayashi's pvclock on Xen, it didn't
> work for me. I didn't have time to investigate why but
> probably because we need per-cpu readings. Which you do
> for KVM. I'll test this on Xen as soon as I get to the
>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 23:09 +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 16:31 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > > Index: arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h
> > >
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 16:31 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > Index: arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h,v
> >
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 16:31 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> Index: arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/include/cpufunc.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.25
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.25 cpufunc.h
> ---
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:25 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> I don't know if it's a good idea to depend on Xen's
> definition of vcpu_time_info. I think I have factored
> it out into the pvclock_time_info and put it into the
> pvclockvar.h or something like that. And then made Xen
> use those
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 16:31 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> Recently I updated the kernel lock profiling stuff I've been working on, since
> it had been rotting a bit since witness was introduced. Running my diff on a
> KVM VM, I found there was a pretty huge performance impact (10 minutes to
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:05:25AM +0300, Henri Kemppainen wrote:
> I had a little debugging session with awolk@ over at #openbsd-daily. His
> smtpd would over time end up with hung sessions that never timeout.
>
> The problem is related to the data_io path's congestion control which
> may pause
Recently I updated the kernel lock profiling stuff I've been working on, since
it had been rotting a bit since witness was introduced. Running my diff on a
KVM VM, I found there was a pretty huge performance impact (10 minutes to
build a kernel instead of 4), which turned out to be because
22 matches
Mail list logo
