Interface groups are allocated as follows:
struct ifg_group *
if_creategroup(const char *groupname)
{
struct ifg_group*ifg;
if ((ifg = malloc(sizeof(*ifg), M_TEMP, M_NOWAIT)) == NULL)
return (NULL);
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:00:30AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> inet_makenetandmask() had required another treatment.
>
> Also -prefixlen 0 for -inet has a bug
>
> % doas ./obj/route -T100 add -inet 0.0.0.0 -prefixlen 0 127.0.0.1
> add net 0.0.0.0: gateway 127.0.0.1
> % netstat -nrf inet -
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:18:17 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:55:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> The function mask_addr() doesn't mask address for IPv4 and IPv6. Does
>> any address family other than IPv4 or IPv6 require #1142:1148? The
>> function seems to just tri
Hi Jason,
On 27/06/2020, at 10:09 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> [...] I thought I'd lay out my understanding of the matter,
> and you can let me know whether or not this corresponds with what you
> had in mind:
> [...]
My main concern is the end-to-end TCP or UDP transport checksum of the
tu
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:58 PM sven falempin
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:12 PM Bob Beck wrote:
>
>>
>> > Awesome, thanks!
>> >
>> > I will test that, ASAP,
>> > do not hesitate to slay dragon,
>> > i heard the bathing in the blood pool is good for the skin
>> >
>> > Little concern,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:27:50PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 29.6.2020. 10:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > I reworked tool for reproduce. Now I avoided fork()/exec() route and it
> > takes couple of minutes to take panic on 4 cores. Also some screenshots
> > attached.
> >
> > I hope anyo
Hi,
I think we all agree that global locks should be represented using
uppercase letters in locking annotations. This is an attempt to
harmonize the existing annotations.
Comments? OK?
Index: dev/dt/dt_dev.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sy
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:10:24PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 27/06/20(Sat) 00:35, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:12:16PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 26/06/20(Fri) 16:56, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > > if_clone_create() has the races caused by context s
screenshot
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:55:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> The function mask_addr() doesn't mask address for IPv4 and IPv6. Does
> any address family other than IPv4 or IPv6 require #1142:1148? The
> function seems to just trim the trailing zero. Is it neccesaary? And
> it causes the c
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:10:24PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 27/06/20(Sat) 00:35, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 09:12:16PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 26/06/20(Fri) 16:56, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > > if_clone_create() has the races caused by context s
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:12 PM Bob Beck wrote:
>
> > Awesome, thanks!
> >
> > I will test that, ASAP,
> > do not hesitate to slay dragon,
> > i heard the bathing in the blood pool is good for the skin
> >
> > Little concern, I did the test without the MFS and ran into issues ,
> > anyway i get
knote_processexit() uses knote_remove() to clear any remaining knotes
from &pr->ps_klist when process `pr' exits. All EVFILT_PROC knotes are
removed by the KNOTE(&pr->ps_klist, NOTE_EXIT) call. However, ps_klist
can contain EVFILT_SIGNAL knotes after the KNOTE().
To reserve knote_remove() for the
> Awesome, thanks!
>
> I will test that, ASAP,
> do not hesitate to slay dragon,
> i heard the bathing in the blood pool is good for the skin
>
> Little concern, I did the test without the MFS and ran into issues ,
> anyway i get back to you (or list ?) when i have test report with patched
> ke
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:44 AM Bob Beck wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:18:06PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:40 AM Bryan Linton wrote:
> >
> > > On 2020-06-27 19:29:31, Bob Beck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No.
> > > >
> > > > I know *exactly* what needbuf is but to
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:18:06PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 2:40 AM Bryan Linton wrote:
>
> > On 2020-06-27 19:29:31, Bob Beck wrote:
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > I know *exactly* what needbuf is but to attempt to diagnose what your
> > > problem is we need exact deta
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 18:45:07 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
> Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>>
>>> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
>>> add net ::/0: gateway
On 29.6.2020. 10:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> I reworked tool for reproduce. Now I avoided fork()/exec() route and it
> takes couple of minutes to take panic on 4 cores. Also some screenshots
> attached.
>
> I hope anyone else will try it.
Hi,
i'm getting panic quite fast :)
i will leave box i
Sebastian Benoit(be...@openbsd.org) on 2020.06.29 16:18:03 +0200:
> Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200:
> > This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4).
> >
> > Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi
> > as usual. Nothing shou
Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2020.06.26 14:45:53 +0200:
> This patch adds support for 11n Tx aggregation to iwm(4).
>
> Please help with testing if you can by running the patch and using wifi
> as usual. Nothing should change, except that Tx speed may potentially
> improve. If you have time
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> both phase 1 and phase 5 need cylinder group metadata. This diff
> keeps the cg data read in phase 1 in memory to be used by phase 5 if
> possible. From FreeBSD.
>
> -Otto
>
> On an empty 30T fileystem:
>
> $ time
Woahhh,
was also trying 5GHz (and tcpbench against one of our bsd servers in DMZ):
469651560 bytes sent over 85.291 seconds
bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 3.475/43.927/87.071/29.809 Mbps
6 new output block ack agreements
0 output block ack agreements timed out
(Tomorrow @work
Hi Stefan,
for me the patch works in mode 11n:
before (OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #304: Fri Jun 26 02:08:50 MDT 2020)
bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev = 2.354/12.319/15.391/3.850 Mbps
with patch (OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Mon Jun 29 09:35:24 GMT 2020)
bandwidth min/avg/max/std-dev
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:12:23 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>>
>> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
>> add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em0: Invalid argument
>>
>> route command trims the sockaddr to
On 28/06/20(Sun) 20:41, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When "::/0" is used as "default",
>
> # route add ::/0 fe80::1%em0
> add net ::/0: gateway fe80::1%em0: Invalid argument
>
> route command trims the sockaddr to { .len = 2, .family = AF_INET6 }
> for "::/0", but rtable_satoplen() refu
25 matches
Mail list logo