On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:44:41PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:10 PM Scott Cheloha
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 01:41:50PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> >
> ...
>
> > > After thinking through states more, #4 isn't safe: _fwalk() can't take
> > >
Hello,
the issue described here has been hit bu Stuart some time ago. feel free to
stop reading if you don't care/use pf(4) synproxy.
let's assume there are rules which allow just surfing web over http:
block all
pass proto tcp from any to any port = 80 synproxy state
pass proto
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 01:59:00 +0100
Noth wrote:
> Disk: sd0 Usable LBA: 34 to 4000797326 [4000797360 Sectors]
> #: type [ start: size ]
>
> 0: EFI Sys
Here we go (sd0 is the NVMe, sd0a is an encrypted OpenBSD install, which
is on sd2). And yes, once decrypted, I can write to the partitions:
Disk: sd0 Usable LBA: 34 to 4000797326 [4000797360 Sectors]
#: type [ start: size ]
Mark Kettenis writes:
>> From: Greg Steuck
>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
>>
>> Mark Kettenis writes:
>>
>> > The diff below fixes the way we handle named references in AML
>> > packages. This fixes some bugs but I'd like to make sure that this
>> > doesn't inadvertedly break
> From: Noth
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:18:14 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> As a follow up, I got a usb-c stick and installed -current to that.
> It boots the system so I now have a dmesg, pcidump and usbdump for you:
>
> http://casper.nineinchnetworks.ch/images/dmesg9310.txt
>
>
Hi,
As a follow up, I got a usb-c stick and installed -current to that.
It boots the system so I now have a dmesg, pcidump and usbdump for you:
http://casper.nineinchnetworks.ch/images/dmesg9310.txt
http://casper.nineinchnetworks.ch/images/pcidump9310.txt
> From: Greg Steuck
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
>
> Mark Kettenis writes:
>
> > The diff below fixes the way we handle named references in AML
> > packages. This fixes some bugs but I'd like to make sure that this
> > doesn't inadvertedly break things. So tests on a wide variety
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:17:47 +0100
> From: Theo Buehler
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:10:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > From: Greg Steuck
> > > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
> > >
> > > Mark Kettenis writes:
> > >
> > > > The diff below fixes the way we handle named
According to dbopen(3), the 'type' field of struct DB holds the "type of
the underlying access method (and file format)." In __bt_open() it is set
to DB_BTREE and in __hash_open() it is set to DB_HASH, so one might expect
that in __rec_open() it is set to DB_RECNO. However, it is left
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:10:33PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Greg Steuck
> > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
> >
> > Mark Kettenis writes:
> >
> > > The diff below fixes the way we handle named references in AML
> > > packages. This fixes some bugs but I'd like to make sure
As recently pointed out by jmatthew@ these need the lock as well, ok?
Index: uvm/uvm_km.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_km.c,v
retrieving revision 1.137
diff -u -p -r1.137 uvm_km.c
--- uvm/uvm_km.c23 May 2020 06:15:09
On 01/12/20(Tue) 15:30, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> [...]
> Did you run a make build with that smr_barrier() in it and checked that it
> does not cause a slow down? I am sceptical, smr_barrier() is a very slow
> construct which introduces large delays and should be avoided whenever
> possible.
I did
> From: Greg Steuck
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
>
> Mark Kettenis writes:
>
> > The diff below fixes the way we handle named references in AML
> > packages. This fixes some bugs but I'd like to make sure that this
> > doesn't inadvertedly break things. So tests on a wide variety
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:18:59 -0300
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 01/12/20(Tue) 15:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:08:50 -0300
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > As recently pointed out by jmatthew@ these need the lock as well, ok?
> >
> > No. These pages are
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:59:22AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:14:46PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Thought I'd try a WITNESS kernel to see if that gives any clues about
> > what's going on with my APU crashing all over the place (long shot but
> > I got bored
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:19:28PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/11/20(Wed) 11:19, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Here's a 3rd approach to solve the TOCTOU race in single_thread_set().
> > The issue being that the lock serializing access to `ps_single' is not
> > held when calling
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Every multi-threaded process keeps a list of threads in `ps_threads'.
> This list is iterated in interrupt and process context which makes it
> complicated to protect it with a rwlock.
>
> One of the places where such iteration is
On 2020/12/01 10:32, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:59:22AM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:14:46PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Thought I'd try a WITNESS kernel to see if that gives any clues about
> > > what's going on with my APU
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:35:18PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 01/12/20(Tue) 15:30, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > [...]
> > Did you run a make build with that smr_barrier() in it and checked that it
> > does not cause a slow down? I am sceptical, smr_barrier() is a very slow
> > construct which
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Greg Steuck
> > Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 20:54:59 -0800
> >
> > Mark Kettenis writes:
> >
> > > The diff below fixes the way we handle named references in AML
> > > packages. This fixes some bugs but I'd like to make sure
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:20:31PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> > Let rad(8) handle all rdomains in a single daemon, similar to previous
> > work in slaacd.
> >
> > Suggested / requested by tb who showed me previous work
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:31:43AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Every multi-threaded process keeps a list of threads in `ps_threads'.
> > This list is iterated in interrupt and process context which makes it
> > complicated to
On 2020/12/01 21:27, Matt Dunwoodie wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:32:29 +0100
> Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> > Jason, Matt,
> >
> > sthen@ told me that the same lock is reported several times (exactly,
> > two locks are reported several times: lock1, lock2, lock1, lock2...)
> >
> > witness(4)
I copied the (void)strlcpy from somewhere, likely ifconfig originally.
Thanks for pointing it out, I shall remove it before commit.
I don't like that style and don't think it helps anything during review since
one needs to check anyway that truncation either can't happen or doesn't matter.
On 1
On 01/12/20(Tue) 10:21, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:19:28PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 04/11/20(Wed) 11:19, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Here's a 3rd approach to solve the TOCTOU race in single_thread_set().
> > > The issue being that the lock serializing access to
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:47:35PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:31:43AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Every multi-threaded process keeps a list of threads in `ps_threads'.
> > > This list is
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:32:29 +0100
Sebastien Marie wrote:
> Jason, Matt,
>
> sthen@ told me that the same lock is reported several times (exactly,
> two locks are reported several times: lock1, lock2, lock1, lock2...)
>
> witness(4) reports when a lock doesn't have LO_INITIALIZED flag set in
>
On 01/12/20(Tue) 21:47, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:31:43AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Every multi-threaded process keeps a list of threads in `ps_threads'.
> > > This list is iterated in interrupt
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:27:15AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 01/12/20(Tue) 10:21, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:19:28PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 04/11/20(Wed) 11:19, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Here's a 3rd approach to solve the TOCTOU race in
Hello tech@,
Long story short: the traphandler process in snmpd annoys me a great
deal and is in the way for overhauling the transport mapping section
of snmpe, which is needed for implementing new agentx master support.
The current traphandler process is also a joke, since all it does is
On 01/12/20(Tue) 15:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:08:50 -0300
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > As recently pointed out by jmatthew@ these need the lock as well, ok?
>
> No. These pages are "unmanaged" and therefore they can not be on any
> of the page queues and
On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:07:18 +0100, "Boudewijn Dijkstra" wrote:
> According to dbopen(3), the 'type' field of struct DB holds the "type of
> the underlying access method (and file format)." In __bt_open() it is set
> to DB_BTREE and in __hash_open() it is set to DB_HASH, so one might expect
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:46:00AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 01/12/20(Tue) 21:47, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:31:43AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > Every multi-threaded process keeps a
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:08:50 -0300
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> As recently pointed out by jmatthew@ these need the lock as well, ok?
No. These pages are "unmanaged" and therefore they can not be on any
of the page queues and locking those page queues would be pointless.
We probably should
35 matches
Mail list logo
