On 2022/08/11 23:11:11 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 08:41:43PM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > On 2022/08/11 19:37:08 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Reading through the fcgi code of httpd I wonder if HEAD requests are
> > > handled correctly. In server_fcgi_read() the
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:59:55AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() do nearly the same thing, but they
> are implemented differently.
>
> The idea of this diff is to move things around. Then only differences
> from the IP standards but not in
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The IPv6 routing header type 0 check should modify *offp only in
> case of an error, so that the genrated icmp6 packet has the correct
> pointer. After successful return, *offp should not be modified.
makes
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:06:14PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > There is currently a race in bgpd when multiple nexthop become invalid at
> > the same time. The problem is that the decision process may select an
> > alternative
Subj.
Index: sys/net/if_pflow.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pflow.c,v
retrieving revision 1.94
diff -u -p -r1.94 if_pflow.c
--- sys/net/if_pflow.c 6 Jun 2022 14:45:41 - 1.94
+++ sys/net/if_pflow.c 12 Aug 2022
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 07:26:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This adds support for booting from RAID 1C volumes on amd64.
> Only boot-loader changes are needed. Both installboot(8) and
> the kernel already do what is required to make this work.
>
> I have tested with biosboot in vmm. The
After all this slowcgi timeout fixing, here a similar thing for bgplgd(8).
If the timeout fires, kill the bgpctl command first with SIGTERM then with
SIGKILL. If the kill fails, close and cleanup the connection.
I also reduced the timeout to a more reasonable 30sec. Lets see how that
goes. This
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 04:54:56PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Subj.
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/net/if_pflow.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pflow.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.94
> diff -u -p -r1.94 if_pflow.c
> ---
There is currently a race in bgpd when multiple nexthop become invalid at
the same time. The problem is that the decision process may select an
alternative path that also has a no longer valid nexthop but the process
that does all the adjustments did not reach that prefix yet.
The main issue here
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 07:26:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This adds support for booting from RAID 1C volumes on amd64.
This is so cool and I can't wait to get a chance to try it out!
> Only boot-loader changes are needed. Both installboot(8) and
> the kernel already do what is required
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:43:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> There is currently a race in bgpd when multiple nexthop become invalid at
> the same time. The problem is that the decision process may select an
> alternative path that also has a no longer valid nexthop but the process
> that does
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> After all this slowcgi timeout fixing, here a similar thing for bgplgd(8).
> If the timeout fires, kill the bgpctl command first with SIGTERM then with
> SIGKILL. If the kill fails, close and cleanup the connection.
> I also reduced
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 07:26:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This adds support for booting from RAID 1C volumes on amd64.
>
> This is so cool and I can't wait to get a chance to try it out!
>
> > Only boot-loader changes
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:16:36PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > After all this slowcgi timeout fixing, here a similar thing for bgplgd(8).
> > If the timeout fires, kill the bgpctl command first with SIGTERM then with
> > SIGKILL.
On 28.6.2022. 15:11, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> This adds the (not quite) final bits to em(4) to enable multiple rx/tx queues.
> Note that desktop/laptop models (I218, I219 etc.) do not support multiple
> queues,
> so this only really applies to servers and network appliances (including
> APU2).
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:20:40PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I am currently trying to find time in order to test my patch on
> real hardware. Any additional testing would be very welcome.
I found time :)
Tested on real hardware with 4 disks.
Both biosboot and UEFI boot are working as
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:10:19PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > An errata exists for RFC 6482, which informs us: """The EE certificate
> > MUST NOT use "inherit" elements as described in [RFC3779].""" Read the
> >
On 25.6.2022. 22:29, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> There is a bug in the firmware of ix(4) NICs, at least with chip 82599 and
> x540. I could not test it with x550 chips, but i guess they have the same
> bug.
Hi,
I've tested tso with latest snapshot on x552 with or without vlan and
everything seems to
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 07:28:57PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 03:20:40PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I am currently trying to find time in order to test my patch on
> > real hardware. Any additional testing would be very welcome.
>
> I found time :)
>
> Tested
Use raid1c-specific meta-data while looking for a key disk that
belongs to a RAID 1C volume.
By dumb luck this is only a cosmetic issue, because struct layout
happens to put the field in the same place.
ok?
diff a87e94ce1617958c99b63ed0a056e46650a27375
ba39970f6365aeeb1b486101f6573c60b7f88573
Hello Stefan,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 02:38:16PM +, Stefan Butz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this mail includes a patch to store pf rules in a red-black tree.
> Currently they are stored in a linked list.
> My system configured with 16000 rules takes about 10 minutes
> to print them out using
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:41:59AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Here's the adapted diff for arm64 minus manual bits to avoid churn for
> now.
>
> installboot(8) needs softraid(4) support (see my diff on tech@), but
> besides that, root on passphrase 1C softraid on arm64 works as expected:
>
>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:51:17PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Booting off softraid on arm64 is supported but installboot(8) has no
> softraid(4) support on arm64.
>
> This means installboot always copies the single bootstrap efiboot on the
> root volume and completely ignores softraid chunks,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:51:17PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Booting off softraid on arm64 is supported but installboot(8) has no
> softraid(4) support on arm64.
>
> This means installboot always copies the single bootstrap efiboot on the
> root volume and completely ignores softraid chunks,
Dear all,
The below changeset extends rpki-client(8) to validate and emit
Autonomous System Provider Authorizations (ASPAs) in JSON format for
consumption in other routing stacks.
The ASPA CMS protected content type is specified here:
25 matches
Mail list logo
