Seven years ago I tried to restart a configuration file and it didn't
work out: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=147318006722787=2
This morning I tried to disable a different configuration file and got
similar results. Maybe my hands get too used to typing ".conf" when I
am fiddling with config
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:09:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > So isn't the real problem that some of the lower-level code involved
> > in the resume path isn't properly marked to not do the
> > instrumentation? Traditionally that was assembly code and we'd use
> >
On 3 Jul 2023, at 23:39, Lee, Jonathan D wrote:
> [cid:cd2efd41-42cb-4d83-9173-521bbb8f4539@namprd04.prod.outlook.com]
>
> Hello fellow software developers,
>
> I have noticed that p0f database files are not being updated.
And I have noticed that you sent two copies of a 6.7 megabyte email to
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> So isn't the real problem that some of the lower-level code involved
> in the resume path isn't properly marked to not do the
> instrumentation? Traditionally that was assembly code and we'd use
> NENTRY() (in amd64) or ENTRY_NP() (on some other architectures) to
>
Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Secondary CPUs are still running at the top of sleep_state(). To
> disable _mcount with gmoninit we would need to wait until after
> secondary CPUs have halted to toggle it off, which is way further into
> sleep_state().
I suspect you are exaggerating the window of time
I dare you to write the simplest fix for this, instead of a diff that
scrolls by.
Hello,
I have a problem with relayd and redirects. If I disable a table, redirect
stays down only for a while.
After a few seconds, redirect gets active again and forwards to the disabled
table.
Same happens for redirect with a backup forward table.
Redirect points momentarily to backup table
On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 05:15:26PM +0300, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> I am not aware of any more limitations when enabling LRO for TCP
> in the network drivers. The feature allows to receive agregated
> packets larger than the MTU. Receiving TCP streams becomes much
> faster.
>
> As the network
> Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 17:24:41 -0500
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 08:11:43PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 12:52:20PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > This patch fixes resume/unhibernate on GPROF kernels where kgmon(8)
> > > has activated kernel
Ping?
Le lun. 3 juil. 2023, 02:49, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello, all attached patch implements feature 64-bit for ext2. This was
> enabled implicitly on my Ubuntu and probably on many other systems. Since
> it's an incompat feature lack of its support
Ping?
Le lun. 3 juil. 2023, 02:59, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On, at least, some Chromebook PS/2 protocol is implemented by EC rather
> than a real PS/2 controller. It works fine except for 2 things:
> * Unusual layout like multimedia keys instead of F*
> *
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:42:55AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I dare you to write the simplest fix for this, instead of a diff that
> scrolls by.
This patch seems to work. Will need to bang on it for a few more days.
1. Disable gmoninit after sched_stop_scondary_cpus(). The secondary
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:57:39 -0500
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:42:55AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I dare you to write the simplest fix for this, instead of a diff that
> > scrolls by.
>
> This patch seems to work. Will need to bang on it for a few more days.
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> It is still a bit scary to have cpu_hatch() call _mcount() but I guess
> adding __attribute__((no_profile)) to all of the functions called by
> cpu_hatch() isn't really workable either.
It now immediately returns.
> > + int gmon_state = gmoninit;
>
> No variable
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:19:35PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:57:39 -0500
> > From: Scott Cheloha
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 07:42:55AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I dare you to write the simplest fix for this, instead of a diff that
> > > scrolls by.
>
I spent some time during the last hackathon, talking to various people over
where we're going.
I'm a bit afraid that people are going to see the ports/package framework
as "not invited" (because some of the subsystems of OpenBSD are not exactly
oustide friendly)
Right now, I got one student
Tl;Dr: I'm not trying too hard to use Devel::Cover
but so far it fails abysmally with BOTH pkg_add and dpb.
I'll admit that both are playing "fun" games with identity
but seriously, Devel::NYTProf didn't care at all !
I've spent a few hours trying to figure out options
(loose_perms won't help)
17 matches
Mail list logo
