Top Shop
Saznaj koji si tip, oblikuj svoje telo - izgledaj seksi i osvoji SUPER
nagrade!
E=eliš lepo i privlaD
no telo uz bolju ishranu i veEbe koje nisu
zahtevne?
Power Track Plus
Total Vibes
Deluxe Sationary Home Gym
Da li je tvoja zadnjica prevelika? Kukovi preširoki?
UkljuD
i se u
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:12:54AM -0400, Brynet wrote:
| Daniel wrote:
| Same here. Really, I'm surprised that anyone is using the 'users'
| group at all these days, especially on OpenBSD. If all users are in
| the same group, group permissions are no different from world
| permissions.
|
Paul de Weerd wrote:
Welcome, to the real world. Users are incapable of just about
anything. Except for fucking things up, they're extremely good at
that. Live with it.
So wait, are you for or against creating lone groups for individual users?
All I was trying to communicate is that the
* Brynet bry...@gmail.com [2010-10-30 11:12]:
All I was trying to communicate is that the exposure of a users home
directory is something that must be dealt with by system administrators
or preferably by the individual users themselves.
[ ] you grok sane defaults
--
Henning Brauer,
On 2010/10/29 21:55, Andres Perera wrote:
Defining a bunch of functions just to update the term title is
ridiculous.
I use this. Also it's a good way to find bugs in cwm :)
--- src/etc/ksh.kshrc.origFri Oct 29 21:40:51 2010
+++ src/etc/ksh.kshrc Fri Oct 29 21:51:48 2010
@@ -45,16 +45,7
On 10/15/10 10:50, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball has been uploaded yesterday, it contains the fixes eric@ wrote
for the issues reported on asr.
For now, only two issues have been reported on smtpd:
1- smtpd does not catch up changes to /etc/resolv.conf;
2- smtpd does not look
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball with all reported issues fixed is available at:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/smtpd-asyncdns.tar.gz
smtpd now catches changes in /etc/resolv.conf and should work fine with
inet6 records.
I have
On 10/30/10 17:23, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 04:55:36PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Hi tech@,
A new tarball with all reported issues fixed is available at:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/smtpd-asyncdns.tar.gz
smtpd now catches changes in /etc/resolv.conf and should
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:28:42PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
It was a typo indeed, tarball has been updated and also contains a fix for
a crash experienced by todd@ when using relay via
Gilles
I had a look at the pack.c file where the DNS compression is being handled.
It looks good to me.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
I had a look at the pack.c file where the DNS compression is being handled.
It looks good to me. But I have one concern that needs to be confirmed.
In function dname_expand() on lines:
54 ptr =
The word slave will not appear in the manpage when the nsd.conf source
looks like it
does.
Patch here:
Index: nsd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/nsd/nsd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 nsd.conf.5
---
PROFESSIONAL PROPOSAL REPORT WRITING
(Informative, Persuasive, Clear Professional)
28 â 29 November 2010
Abu Dhabi - UAE
Download Brochure: PRW-Abu Dhabi(pdf format)
Book Your Seat : RESERVE ME A SEAT
_
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Same here. Really, I'm surprised that anyone is using the 'users'
group at all these days, especially on OpenBSD. If all users are in
the same group, group permissions are no different from world
permissions.
I
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the real problem here is that you're allowing users on your
systems that are incapable of properly setting the group/world
permissions of their home directories.
My employer lets a variety of people on their systems -
Hi Janne, hi Jakob,
Janne Johansson wrote on Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:03:51PM +0200:
The word slave will not appear in the manpage when the nsd.conf
source looks like it does.
OK schwarze@; but please make sure this is also sent upstream,
ideally coordinated with the rest of the cleanup
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Vladimir Kirillov wrote:
I've been trying to test rthreads and have hit some weird races
using simple tests:
...
I get this segfault almost always:
#0 pthread_exit (retval=0x0) at /usr/src/lib/librthread/rthread.c:223
223 for (clfn = thread-cleanup_fns;
Did this go in?
If not, looks fine and works for me, sorry for the delay testing this
one got lost in my inbox.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 08:44:47PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:01:24AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
Done. Next? :-).
Ken
Clean
17 matches
Mail list logo
