On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:16:55AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
> > > NIC. Is
> > > there an updated diff?
> >
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
> > NIC. Is
> > there an updated diff?
>
> Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
> the minor
PF's "set limit" option allows five memory pools to be specified
(states, frags, src-nodes, tables, and table-entries); however, the
pf.conf BNF grammar specification on the pf.conf(5) man page only
lists three.
The following diff fixes this by completing the list of possible
values for the limit-
I mean... my alc0 still works...
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
>>> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
NIC. Is
>>> there
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
>> Is
>> there an updated diff?
>
> Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
> the minor conflicts and
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
> Is
> there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
the minor conflicts and linewrapping issue with the diff.
Untested beyond "it builds".
Te
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:21:16AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
> > mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
> > Tested on Acer AOD255E.
>
>
Hi,
I'd like to ear back of anyone actually using one of the following X
input drivers on a regular basis:
xf86-input-acecad
xf86-input-citron
xf86-input-fpit
xf86-input-hyperpen
xf86-input-mutouch
xf86-input-penmount
Those drivers are not really maintained, and probably already broken.
So far
the text body
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 04:21:27PM +0200, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> du.c doesn't define its tree prototypes. However, if I understand man tree,
> it should.
The idea being that you're defining the rb functions without first
prototyping them
in this case RB_GENERATE_STATIC would prob
Hi,
du.c doesn't define its tree prototypes. However, if I understand man tree,
it should.
Ok?
--
Ariane
Index: du.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/du/du.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -p -r1.23 du.c
--- du.c27 Ap
May 1, 2011.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.9.
This is our 29th release on CD-ROM (and 30th via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote
holes in the
* Peter N. M. Hansteen [2011-05-01 11:05]:
> The 10th European BSD conference will take place in Maarssen, the
> Netherlands on 6 - 9 October 2011, a fresh website is up at
> http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/.
>
> The call for proposals has been out for a while, with the deadline set
> at May 15th (wil
The 10th European BSD conference will take place in Maarssen, the
Netherlands on 6 - 9 October 2011, a fresh website is up at
http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/.
The call for proposals has been out for a while, with the deadline set
at May 15th (will be extended if necessary).
I would very much like t
On 27/04/11(Wed) 14:21, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 27/04/11(Wed) 12:41, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 26/04/11(Tue) 18:29, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > The following diff adds support for dfs. It requires my precedent patch
> > > about GPIOs. I don't have a machine with a MPC7448 so it's only test
15 matches
Mail list logo
