Re: PATCH: Virtio memory balooning

2012-11-07 Thread Dinar Talypov
Hi, Here is a updated version: - fixes panic when host requests more memory to deflate than guest has - some cleanup Index: files.pci === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/files.pci,v retrieving revision 1.289 diff -u -r1.289 files.pci

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 22:52:19 +0100 Lars von den Driesch wrote: > > The only distros with a fair few users who have switched and still > > have far less users are Fedora, Mageia and OpenSUSE. > > Let's have an eye on Arch-Linux. And they have lost users over it. I left them out because they hav

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread Lars von den Driesch
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > The only distros with a fair few users who have switched and still > have far less users are Fedora, Mageia and OpenSUSE. Let's have an eye on Arch-Linux. They have switched to systemd recently and seem to be very confident about it. For me

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Here you can read what Linux devs think about Dfly for example > https://plus.google.com/101384639386588513837/posts/Dkb8iixE4eP Yes, let's all work on Linux!!! Let's all move to Texas. And, what's with this water? Like in the toilets? What about

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:40 PM, William Ahern wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:24:58PM -0200, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: >> > >> > It's also quickly turning Posix and Unix into a travesty: either you have >> > the linux goodies, or yo

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread William Ahern
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:24:58PM -0200, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > > > It's also quickly turning Posix and Unix into a travesty: either you have > > the linux goodies, or you don't. And if you don't, you can forget anything > > moder

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Bartelt
and these also look good: > dmesg|grep ^em em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 PT (82572EI)" rev 0x06: apic 2 int 17, address X:X:X:X:X:X > ifconfig em hwfeatures em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 hwfeatures=36 lladdr X:X:X:X:X:X priority: 0 groups: egress

Re: [cwm 1/1] Add a menu to search and call internal functions.

2012-11-07 Thread Thomas Pfaff
> > Why not > > > > for (iter = 0; iter < nitems(name_to_kbfunc); iter++) { > > func = &name_to_kbfunc[iter]; /* if you want to use func */ > > > > then you don't need the last NULL entry in the array or add code > > to not break existing code. > > See: http://c-faq.com/decl/extarray

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Bartelt
looks good: # dmesg |grep ^em em0 at pci9 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 PT (82571EB)" rev 0x06: apic 0 int 8, address X:X:X:X:X:X em1 at pci9 dev 0 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000 PT (82571EB)" rev 0x06: apic 0 int 18, address X:X:X:X:X:X # ifconfig em hwfeatures em0: flags=8b43 mtu 1500

Re: Calling all softdep lovers: This turns down the suck on softdep.

2012-11-07 Thread Bob Beck
Just a followon for tech people - if you do use this and hit a problem, I would very much appreciate your dmesg, as well as from ddb, "ps" "trace" "show bcstats" and "show uvm". -Bob On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:25:55AM -0700, Bob B

Re: upstream vendors and why they can be really harmful

2012-11-07 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> and if you come with proper arguments (and code) they will be more than > happy to include it or change the way they do things to accomodate to > standards. Lennart is a different matter, he made it clear he doesn't > care about the rest of the ecosystem. But he is just one guy and his > lobbying

Re: Calling all softdep lovers: This turns down the suck on softdep.

2012-11-07 Thread Mike Larkin
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:25:55AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote: > Hello tech@. > > I just committed some significant fixes to the buffer cache in -current. > (you want to look for version 1.139 of vfs_bio.c) > > If you have such a current kernel, you may wish to try the following > diff - it is a bac

Calling all softdep lovers: This turns down the suck on softdep.

2012-11-07 Thread Bob Beck
Hello tech@. I just committed some significant fixes to the buffer cache in -current. (you want to look for version 1.139 of vfs_bio.c) If you have such a current kernel, you may wish to try the following diff - it is a backout of a previous commit that emasculated softdep in order to make is s

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Window class and name both come from WM_CLASS property.

2012-11-07 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Mon 2012.11.05 at 13:33 -0600, kspill...@acm.org wrote: > Explicitly mention that the values of class and name for use with autogroup > can both be obtained from the WM_CLASS property of existing windows. applied this one - thank you.

ix: IFCAP_CSUM flags are pointless for the rx checksums

2012-11-07 Thread Mike Belopuhov
Remove code that is confusing and wrong: we don't want to disable rx checksumming if IFCAP_CSUM_IPv4 is set. Whatever this code used to mean in FreeBSD it doesn't do any good here. IXGBE_RXCSUM_PCSD is set when you do RSS (and is correctly handled in the visible RSS chunk below). OK? Index: if_

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:06:31 +0100 Christopher Zimmermann wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:46:34 +0100 > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > > > > > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable T

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 5.11.2012 23:45, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 5.11.2012. 14:38, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> it's working here. > > Please ignore "working here" part. It is enabled here. > Will play with combination of 82546GB and 82541GI interfaces. > 82546GB pf (with henning's patch) + ipforwar

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > Hi, > > somewhat strange results here > > $ ifconfig em0 hwfeatures > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > hwfeatures=36 > lladdr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX > priority: 0 > groups: egress > media: Ethernet autoselect (100b

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Hi, somewhat strange results here $ ifconfig em0 hwfeatures em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 hwfeatures=36 lladdr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX priority: 0 groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex,rxpause,txpause) status: active inet X.X

Re: PATCH: Virtio memory balooning

2012-11-07 Thread Janne Johansson
Ok, so I added the required line to amd64 GENERIC and ran a KVM guest with it, dmesg now says: virtio1 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 "Qumranet Virtio Memory" rev 0x00: Virtio Memory Balloon Device viomb0 at virtio1 virtio1: apic 1 int 10 Dont think I have enough shiny GUIs to monitor ballooning stats,

Re: PATCH: Virtio memory balooning

2012-11-07 Thread Janne Johansson
Any reason for this being i386 or just not tested on virtual amd64s? 2012/11/6 Dinar Talypov : > Hi, > This patch adds virtio memory ballooning device support. > Actually code was taken from NetBSD and I rewrote some > OpenBSD specific parts. > > +static const struct virtio_feature_name vio