Re: [PATCH] typo introduced in libssl/src/crypto/ec/ecp_nistp521.c

> Hi, > > I notice a typo since revision 1.3 by miod@, correction below:: Oops. Fixed. Thanks! Miod

[PATCH] typo introduced in libssl/src/crypto/ec/ecp_nistp521.c

Hi, I notice a typo since revision 1.3 by miod@, correction below:: --- src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/ec/ecp_nistp521.c 8 May 2014 12:59:17 - 1.5 +++ src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/ec/ecp_nistp521.c 9 May 2014 22:11:32 - @@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ .points_make_affine = ec_GFp_sim

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 18:50, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > But if you like OpenRCS as it is and don't want to get any diffs unless > security fixes, then just say it. > Or if you work on other stuff and you don't have time for that, then just > say it. Personally, I don't much like to see diffs "f

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Martin Pieuchot > wrote: >> On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda >>> wrote: >>> >>> This commit breaks re

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda >> wrote: >> >> This commit breaks resume for my machine: > > Could you find which device and/or controller breaks i

Re: amd64 support for AR9485

> > > No guarantees as to whether this is sufficient, or if further > > work is needed, but it will at least get the device picked up by > > the athn driver. > > Further work is needed. > > I have diffs which do much more but don't yet work either. > I've given up on trying to get this to work for

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:01:52PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Fritjof Bornebusch writes: > > > Hi tech, > > Hi, > > > if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this: > > - comparison between signed and unsigned > > - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression > >

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > > On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > >> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mi

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

Fritjof Bornebusch writes: > Hi tech, Hi, > if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this: > - comparison between signed and unsigned > - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression > > I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct place, but these diffs > removes the w

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: >> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: >>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: >>> > Fritjof Bornebusch writes: >>> > >>> > [..

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: >> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: >> > Fritjof Bornebusch writes: >> > >> > [...] >> > >> > > Does no one want to check the diff and g

Re: [PATCH] comparison between signed and unsigned in rcs

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > Fritjof Bornebusch writes: > > > > [...] > > > > > Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback? > > > > Regardless of the conte

pcidevs nvidia 650GTX

Hello, Here is a small diff for pcidevs to add the NVIDIA GTX 650, including its HDMI audio part. Regards --- sys/dev/pci/pcidevs.old Fri May 9 14:39:50 2014 +++ sys/dev/pci/pcidevs Fri May 9 14:39:26 2014 @@ -5507,6 +5507,8 @@ product NVIDIA MCP89_OHCI 0x0d9c MCP89 USB product NVIDIA MCP

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > > wrote: > >> > >> >>> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Mike Larkin > >> >>> > wrote: > >

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > wrote: >> >> >>> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Mike Larkin >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:30:59PM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo >>

Re: amd64 support for AR9485

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:08:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > You could try adding the ID to the athn driver to get it to match: > > Index: if_athn_pci.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c,v > retrieving revisi

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda < acam...@verlet.org> wrote: > >>> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Mike Larkin > wrote: > >>> >> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:30:59PM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo > Ojeda wrote: > >>> >>> I was trying to build some kernels between 5.3