Support for Appeltalk (sys/netatalk) was removed about 3 years ago but
netintro(4) still mentions it.
Remi
Index: netintro.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/netintro.4,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -p -r1.44 netintro.4
--
Thanks, commited.
On Mon, 26 May 2014 22:24:23 +0200
Benjamin Baier wrote:
> and a big one.
>
> Index: common/bytebuf.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/npppd/common/bytebuf.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -p -r1.5 byte
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 16:29, Brendan MacDonell wrote:
>
> I think this can be extended to expressions, not just identifiers:
>
> @@
> expression x;
> @@
> -if (x) { free(x); }
> +free(x);
>
> This catches another 47 instances. A patch against CVS follows.
Thanks, applied.
On 29/05/2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The first question is why not use fuse? I think it's better to
> have one userland filesystem interface than two.
We already have 2: fuse, nfs.
• 9p can operate over arbitrary transports, such as virtio and tcp. Fuse can't.
• To my knowledge one can't have roo
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:12, strake...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have been writing a 9p vfs interface. Ultimately I hope to have this in
> stock OpenBSD. So far it's incomplete and experimental and often faulty; I
> shall hack it further when I have time, but meanwhile I post the diff here
> in case s
If any interest, please tell me before using earlier code, as I now
have a later version, which I would post in that case.
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 21:00, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
> > I'm not sure how much, and if this breaks anything in Ports.
> >
> > According to github it isn't used much.
>
> We're going to keep this for a while. We would like to keep as much
> API compatibility as possible, even when the API i
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 21:00, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
> I'm not sure how much, and if this breaks anything in Ports.
>
> According to github it isn't used much.
We're going to keep this for a while. We would like to keep as much
API compatibility as possible, even when the API is mostly usele
> I'm not sure how much, and if this breaks anything in Ports.
Then you need to go find out.
> According to github it isn't used much.
Whoa. Think about that for a while.
You want to disrupt the application authors ... now?
I'm not sure how much, and if this breaks anything in Ports.
According to github it isn't used much.
https://github.com/search?q=SSL_get_time+extension%3Ac+language%3Ac&type=Code&ref=searchresults
https://github.com/search?q=SSL_set_time+extension%3Ac+language%3Ac&type=Code&ref=searchresults
http
The diff below removes code which has been disabled since 1998 or maybe even
before.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blame/master/ssl/ssl.h#L1758-L1764
There is a lot of interesting backwards compatibility stuff before and after
this piece of code. I have a diff for the SSL_(set|get)_(time|tim
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 21:44, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> Yes, there is a xcalloc in xmalloc.h/.c.
Thanks, I think I got them all.
Hi,
more localized data access, and there's room in the allocated page(s) anyway.
ok?
-Otto
Index: malloc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.166
diff -u -p -r1.166 malloc.c
--- malloc.
I have been writing a 9p vfs interface. Ultimately I hope to have this in stock
OpenBSD. So far it's incomplete and experimental and often faulty; I shall hack
it further when I have time, but meanwhile I post the diff here in case someone
else wishes to do so. This is my first vfs code, and I'v
On 19/01/10(Tue) 01:07, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> On 26/05/14(Mon) 13:46, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I'd appreciate if people having troubles with suspend/resume could try
> > this diff an report back.
>
> Fixes it for me! :D
> Many thanks.
You're welcome.
> > Previous diff was lacking the
15 matches
Mail list logo
