On 08/12/15 21:21, Larry Hynes wrote:
This is a minor quibble, and possibly a purely personal one, but
'priorly' is not really in common usage.
Index: smtpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5,v
retrieving re
This is a minor quibble, and possibly a purely personal one, but
'priorly' is not really in common usage.
Index: smtpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.127
diff -u -p -r1.127 smtpd.con
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 2015-08-12 20:29, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> >One possible reason to deviate from using the LibreSSL release version
> >would be if we want to continue to be a drop-in replacement for
> >OpenSSL. In that case continuing to adevrtise a reasonable OpenSSL
> >v
> On Wednesday 2015-08-12 20:29, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >One possible reason to deviate from using the LibreSSL release version
> >would be if we want to continue to be a drop-in replacement for
> >OpenSSL. In that case continuing to adevrtise a reasonable OpenSSL
> >version number for openssl.pc,
On Wednesday 2015-08-12 20:29, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
>One possible reason to deviate from using the LibreSSL release version
>would be if we want to continue to be a drop-in replacement for
>OpenSSL. In that case continuing to adevrtise a reasonable OpenSSL
>version number for openssl.pc, libcry
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:29:09PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:15:43 -0600
> > From: Bob Beck
> >
> > I'm wondering out loud if these versions should follow the openbsd shlib
> > major minor numbers. That is where we are careful about semantic
> > versioning for api
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:15:43 -0600
> From: Bob Beck
>
> I'm wondering out loud if these versions should follow the openbsd shlib
> major minor numbers. That is where we are careful about semantic
> versioning for api change/add/remove
No. Shared library versions are tracking the ABI. What
On Tuesday 2015-08-11 03:39, Brent Cook wrote:
>
>> So I think all the .pc files in LibreSSL should simply use the LibreSSL
>> version number (2.2.2) like the openssl.pc does. This does mean that
>> checking
>> for individual libraries in LibreSSL version 2.2.2 and older will probably
>> busted,
I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe
to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big
step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if people could test
it with their usual network setup and report back.
The goal of this diff is to "cache" the
On 2015/08/12 17:10, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:23:44PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/08/10 11:54, sam wrote:
> > > I am also of the opinion that if somebody/a method can discover bugs,
> > > they should report them. And if they can't, that method should be
> > >
I spent some time today figuting out why the binutils update broke ld
-Z on powerpc. Turns out to be a fairly thorny issue.
The new binutils discard empty setions. As a result the .gotpad0 and
.gotpad1 sections have disappeared. And a s a consequence the
__got_start and __got_end symbols are no
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:23:44PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/08/10 11:54, sam wrote:
> > I am also of the opinion that if somebody/a method can discover bugs,
> > they should report them. And if they can't, that method should be
> > disclosed to allow others to continue their work.
>
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 03:38:25PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Awful lot of noise wherein people tell someone else what they should
> > need to do with their time and their code.
> >
> >
> > To the best of my knowledge, we've cited and/or thanked Maxime in the
> > commits fixing the issues he
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 09:17:35AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> The previous mode requested was 1610 (644 in octal), but the value is
> modified by umask value.
I need base 8 revision... it was 1204.
--
Sebastien Marie
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:20:24PM -0500, attila wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> On the 6 Aug snap I ran into this issue:
>
> $ pkg_info | grep libevent
> libevent-2.0.22 event notification library
> $ pkg-config --atleast-version=2.0.1 libevent && echo yes
> Argument "22-stabl" isn't numer
Hi,
The following patch corrects an invalid 644 mode to 0644. fcopy() set
the mode using open(3).
The previous mode requested was 1610 (644 in octal), but the value is
modified by umask value.
This file is the zip exported archive.
--
Sebastien Marie
Index: ikeca.c
==
16 matches
Mail list logo