This error is due to the relatively small storage size available to
store the path to the disk image. I see no reason to use 90 bytes only
and not PATH_MAX here.
Since bumping the size of the struct is an incompatible change, the
kernel keeps some glue to allow old programs to work on a fresh
Hi,
For a long time I was running an amd64 snapshot from 2016/03/30,
then I installed a snapshot from 2016/10/09 on four machines
(two laptops, a desktop and a 1U supermicro).
One apparent difference was that the load average on all four
machines idled at slightly above 1 (1.12, 1.18, ...),
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> Hi,
>
> mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
> ptrmove actions conflict with emacs users' uses, namely all the
> control-[arrow]
> bindings that cwm(1) grabs. It has actually been like this
Hi,
mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
ptrmove actions conflict with emacs users' uses, namely all the control-[arrow]
bindings that cwm(1) grabs. It has actually been like this since keyboard-based
pointer movements were added, almost exactly 9 years ago.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:55 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> there isnt a nice bucket for per cpu counters to use. this makes a
> pretty obvious one.
>
> ok?
>
OK, but could you please put a tab after the #define for style
consistency with the other ones? Also please on't forget to
update