On 2016-05-30 08:59, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 27/04/16(Wed) 18:52, i80...@foxquill.com wrote:
On 2016-04-27 18:20, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>This
>[...snip...]
>and this disagree?
I... am so sorry. You're right of course; I don't know how that patch
happened.
ok mpi@
Regenerated the patch
...and open() only needs the mode argument if O_CREAT is present.
ok?
Index: libexec/comsat/comsat.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/comsat/comsat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -p -r1.45 comsat.c
--- libexec/comsat/comsat.c
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:22:17 +
Bob Beck wrote:
> There will be some libtls api additions post 6.1 to get the peer cert
> in PEM format
Thanks Bob. That sounds like exactly what's needed. Happy to wait.
> In the meantime, testing snaps prior to 6.1 should be the priority.
> not a talkathon.
There will be some libtls api additions post 6.1 to get the peer cert in
PEM format
In the meantime, testing snaps prior to 6.1 should be the priority. not a
talkathon.
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:49 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:53:05PM +1030, Jack Burton wrote:
> > One
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:53:05PM +1030, Jack Burton wrote:
> One common example of that happening is when a cert gets revoked because
> its private key has been lost/stolen and the user needs a new cert
> associated with the same identity. An even more common example is when
> a cert expires & ge
Marc Espie writes:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:00:41PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Marc Espie writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:40:32PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> >> Antoine Jacoutot:
>> >>
>> >> > Why not just:
>> >> >
>> >> > # pkg_add -v rsync chromium em
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 22:21:38 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:03:44PM -0700, William Ahern wrote:
> > Basically, anything short of passing through the entire certificate
> > is going to be severely limiting and frustrating, to the point of
> > uselessness.
>
> Passin
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:03:44 -0700
William Ahern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:31:06PM +1030, Jack Burton wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm leaning towards either local CRL file checking in
> > httpd (with minimal changes to libtls), or passing through enough
> > data to the let the fastcgi resp
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:08:23PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:03:37PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > On ARMv8, the translation table walk is fully coherent so there is no
> > reason to explicitly flush the cache before invalidating the TLB. The
> > barrier that is in
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:03:37PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> On ARMv8, the translation table walk is fully coherent so there is no
> reason to explicitly flush the cache before invalidating the TLB. The
> barrier that is included in out TLB flushing code should be enough to
> guarantee that th
10 matches
Mail list logo