On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:03:07PM -0500, Rob Pierce wrote:
> This reduces the diff with relayd/agentx.c.
A little bit closer now.
ok?
Index: agentx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd/agentx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff
So that events fire punctually even if the system clock is changed.
ok?
--
Scott Cheloha
Index: usr.sbin/sasyncd/sasyncd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/sasyncd/sasyncd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 sasyncd.c
---
This reduces the diff with relayd/agentx.c.
Ok?
Index: agentx.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/snmpd/agentx.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 agentx.c
--- agentx.c5 Jan 2018 08:13:32 - 1.11
+++ agentx.c
OK millert@
- todd
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:08:25 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> I'm unfamiliar with this code, but assigning the microsecond value
> without normalizing it for the timeval looks off.
That makes sense. There's nothing preventing the user from using
values > 100. OK millert@
- todd
ok?
Index: bin/date/date.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/date/date.c,v
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -p -r1.51 date.c
--- bin/date/date.c 23 Dec 2017 20:58:14 - 1.51
+++ bin/date/date.c 12 Feb 2018 16:29:24 -
@@
Hi,
I'm unfamiliar with this code, but assigning the microsecond value
without normalizing it for the timeval looks off.
--
Scott Cheloha
Index: usr.sbin/hostapd/parse.y
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/hostapd/parse.y,v
retrieving
Has there been any discussion of packaging libtls separately from libressl for
portable use? With my limited skills I was able to write a program to talk to
smtpd and starttls using nothing but the manuals. I seriously doubt I could
have done so with the gnu tls library. This really shows how
On 2018/02/12 15:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
>
> Then why not change the priority of the default route?
On a standard machine this is already
On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> routefilter currently filters the default route,
> if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
Then why not change the priority of the default route?
> This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
> redistribute a default
ok
Sebastien Marie(sema...@online.fr) on 2018.02.12 10:07:48 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is preferable to not hardcode IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN in
> ip6_sysctl_soiikey().
>
> No changes expected, as IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN is 16.
>
> netinet6/ip6_var.h
>295 #define IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN 16
>296 extern
routefilter currently filters the default route,
if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
redistribute a default route into ospf, for that you need it in the
routing table but it is configured with a low priority (high value)
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:22:54AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I found my mistake in the previous diff. `SS_NBIO' was never set on
> non blocking sockets. Diff below fixes that by checking `nonblock'
> like it is done in sys_socketpair().
>
> Tests & oks welcome :)
Running with it now on
Hi,
I think it is preferable to not hardcode IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN in
ip6_sysctl_soiikey().
No changes expected, as IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN is 16.
netinet6/ip6_var.h
295 #define IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN 16
296 extern uint8_t ip6_soiikey[IP6_SOIIKEY_LEN];
Thanks.
--
Sebastien Marie
Index:
Diff below introduce multiple 'goto fail' in ptrace_ctrl(). It is
extracted from guenther@'s proctreelk diff because it doesn't introduce
any change in behavior. I'd like to get it in to shrink the locking
diff.
ok?
Index: kern/sys_process.c
I found my mistake in the previous diff. `SS_NBIO' was never set on
non blocking sockets. Diff below fixes that by checking `nonblock'
like it is done in sys_socketpair().
Tests & oks welcome :)
Index: kern/uipc_syscalls.c
===
RCS
16 matches
Mail list logo