On 1/23/21 5:19 PM, Anders Damsgaard wrote:
> (lots of Cc's removed)
>
> * Alejandro Colomar [2021-01-22 00:12:58 +0100]:
>
>> This is useful for using tee to just write to a file,
>> at the end of a pipeline,
>> without having to redirect to /dev/null.
>>
>> Example:
>> echo 'foo' | sudo te
Hello.
According the code `ifaddr’ struct has `ifa_refcnt’ field. Also it seems `ifa’
could exist while corresponding `ifp’ was destroyed. Is this true for `rt’
case? Should `ifa_refcnt' be bumped while you return `ifa’?
> On 9 Jan 2021, at 20:50, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
> This diff place the us
(lots of Cc's removed)
* Alejandro Colomar [2021-01-22 00:12:58 +0100]:
This is useful for using tee to just write to a file,
at the end of a pipeline,
without having to redirect to /dev/null.
Example:
echo 'foo' | sudo tee -q /etc/foo;
is equivalent to the old (and ugly)
echo
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:28:01PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> [cc's trimmed]
>
> On 2021/01/23 15:53, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > This is useful for using tee to just write to a file,
> > at the end of a pipeline,
> > without having to redirect to /dev/null
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > echo
[cc's trimmed]
On 2021/01/23 15:53, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> This is useful for using tee to just write to a file,
> at the end of a pipeline,
> without having to redirect to /dev/null
>
> Example:
>
> echo 'foo' | sudo tee -q /etc/foo;
>
> is equivalent to the old (and ugly)
>
> echo 'foo'
This is useful for using tee to just write to a file,
at the end of a pipeline,
without having to redirect to /dev/null
Example:
echo 'foo' | sudo tee -q /etc/foo;
is equivalent to the old (and ugly)
echo 'foo' | sudo tee /etc/foo >/dev/null;
---
v2: Add --silent synonym to --quiet, per GNU gu
Le Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 06:50:50PM +0100, Denis Fondras a écrit :
> This diff place the user-set source address outside of struct art_root and
> make
> the code more readable (to me).
>
> Based on a concept by mpi@
>
ping.
> Index: net/art.h
> ==
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:11:27PM -0600, Katherine Rohl wrote:
> I noticed that large disk volumes cause problems with the formatting of
> numerical columns in df(1), particularly when using -i. Here's a patch
> that pads out their width a bit and raises the maximum width of
> numerical columns be
