On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:19:30PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> 3. the reason for in6_unlink_ifa being called at all is because
> in6_ifattach_loopback automatically tries to add in6addr_loopback to a
> newly created lo interface, which is the wrong thing to do in the case
> of multiple lo(4) i
On 12/06/13(Wed) 12:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/12 12:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > > > inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398
> > > >
> > > > in6_unl
On 2013/06/12 12:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > > inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398
> > >
> > > in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix
On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398
> >
> > in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix
> > in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398
>
> in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix
> in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix
The error message is triggered by ifcon
Hi,
I have this as /etc/hostname.lo1:
inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398
!route add 172.26.153.0/24 172.26.153.50
!route add default 172.26.153.50 -priority 12
and see the following on boot:
in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix
in6_unlink_ifa: interface a