Re: [PATCH] usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 - Macros can be defined...

2017-08-29 Thread Raf Czlonka
Hi Jason, That's what I wasn't sure about - haven't seen many "that" used in that way ;^) Thanks for the explanation. Raf On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:35:25PM BST, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:22:30PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Not entirely sure what the

Re: [PATCH] usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 - Macros can be defined...

2017-08-29 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:22:30PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote: > Hi all, > > Not entirely sure what the author had in mind but the current > sentence, as it is, doesn't seem right somehow. > > The below is my best guess. > > Cheers, > > Raf > hi. what's there is fine. it is a common text blurb

Re: [PATCH] usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 - Macros can be defined...

2017-08-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
I don't see any problem with the sentence as it stands now. This same text exists in 18 other pages. I'd say it originally came from pf.conf(5). > Not entirely sure what the author had in mind but the current > sentence, as it is, doesn't seem right somehow. > > The below is my best guess. > >

[PATCH] usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 - Macros can be defined...

2017-08-29 Thread Raf Czlonka
Hi all, Not entirely sure what the author had in mind but the current sentence, as it is, doesn't seem right somehow. The below is my best guess. Cheers, Raf Index: usr.sbin/ldapd/ldapd.conf.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ldapd