On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2015-07-17 08:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The phrase No label changes. was selected because it is true
(there is nothing to save). I don't see what further adds to make
this more accurate or understandable.
Perhaps phrasing
On 2015-07-17 08:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The phrase No label changes. was selected because it is true
(there is nothing to save). I don't see what further adds to
make this more accurate or understandable.
I would even argue that adding further makes it more INaccurate and
also adds
This is another trivial patch, but I've always found the disklabel
message No label changes confusing. For example, if you print (p), add
a label (a), write (w), print to check your changes (p), and then quit
(q), it seems odd to be told No label changes.
Index: sbin/disklabel/editor.c
This is another trivial patch, but I've always found the disklabel
message No label changes confusing. For example, if you print (p), add
a label (a), write (w), print to check your changes (p), and then quit
(q), it seems odd to be told No label changes.
Well, the current message makes
This is another trivial patch, but I've always found the disklabel
message No label changes confusing. For example, if you print (p), add
a label (a), write (w), print to check your changes (p), and then quit
(q), it seems odd to be told No label changes.
Index: sbin/disklabel/editor.c
