Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-30 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 05:14:08PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. You're touching a big controversy here. Many

[patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. fritjof Index: diff3.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/diff3.c,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 diff3.c --- diff3.c 4 Mar 2012 04:05:15 - 1.33 +++ diff3.c 29 Nov 2014

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Claus Assmann
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: it's NULL not NUL. Not in this case... NULL: is a pointer (usually 0) NUL: is a character ('\0')

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 05:27:00AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: it's NULL not NUL. Not in this case... NULL: is a pointer (usually 0) NUL: is a character ('\0') Ahh I see, thank you. pgpMkIwf4S_cz.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is the right term when rferring to chars and not pointers, -Otto fritjof Index: diff3.c

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Otto Moerbeek wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is the right term when rferring to chars and not

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

2014-11-29 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is the right term when rferring to chars and not