Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 05:14:08PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > > > > > Hi tech, > > > > > > it's NULL not NUL. > > > > You're touching a big controvers

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > > > Hi tech, > > > > it's NULL not NUL. > > You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is > the right term when rferring to chars and n

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

Hi, Otto Moerbeek wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: >> Hi tech, >> >> it's NULL not NUL. > You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is > the right term when rferring to chars and not

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > Hi tech, > > it's NULL not NUL. You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is the right term when rferring to chars and not pointers, -Otto > > fritjof > > > Index: diff3.c >

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 05:27:00AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > > > it's NULL not NUL. > > Not in this case... > > NULL: is a pointer (usually 0) > NUL: is a character ('\0') > Ahh I see, thank you. pgpMkIwf4S_cz.pgp Description: PGP signat

Re: [patch]rcs: comment typo

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > it's NULL not NUL. Not in this case... NULL: is a pointer (usually 0) NUL: is a character ('\0')

[patch]rcs: comment typo

Hi tech, it's NULL not NUL. fritjof Index: diff3.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/diff3.c,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -r1.33 diff3.c --- diff3.c 4 Mar 2012 04:05:15 - 1.33 +++ diff3.c 29 Nov 2014 13: