Re: GIF interface and Routing Serious Unexpected behavior

2016-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/01/26 20:11, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:23 AM, sven falempin > wrote: > > > > I will test with 5.8 , is it enough or do you absolutely require current ? > > i think for this case only the kernel could be updated. > > There have been big changes to the network/rou

Re: GIF interface and Routing Serious Unexpected behavior

2016-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:23 AM, sven falempin wrote: > > I will test with 5.8 , is it enough or do you absolutely require current ? > i think for this case only the kernel could be updated. There have been big changes to the network/routing stack since 5.8 - at least two hackathons with signific

Re: GIF interface and Routing Serious Unexpected behavior

2016-01-26 Thread sven falempin
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:23 AM, sven falempin wrote: > > Ok this morning the routing of gif was not done , after deleting the > default route and readding it, > tada, it s routed again. > > I will test with 5.8 , is it enough or do you absolutely require current ? > i think for this case only th

GIF interface and Routing Serious Unexpected behavior

2016-01-15 Thread sven falempin
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:56 PM, sven falempin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, sven falempin > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:08 PM, sven falempin >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Tech Reader, >>> Maybe this would be misc but i am trying to avoid some useless answer. >>> This is op