On 2016/02/17 15:45, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:37:36AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > before I post the next iteration of the patch, I'd like
> > some more advice on some of the points you commented (inline):
>
> Christian Ehrhardt has asked me to port his fixes and
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:37:36AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> before I post the next iteration of the patch, I'd like
> some more advice on some of the points you commented (inline):
Christian Ehrhardt has asked me to port his fixes and test his new
diff on -current. Works fine on my
em0
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:37:36AM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> before I post the next iteration of the patch, I'd like
> some more advice on some of the points you commented (inline):
> >
> > Odd that I219 advertises itself as I217
>
> Hm, I didn't look at this code in detail
Hi,
before I post the next iteration of the patch, I'd like
some more advice on some of the points you commented (inline):
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:34:19PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > retrieving revision 1.329
> > diff -
On 2016/02/11 13:59, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Alexander Bluhm writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> >> The diff was initially done for 5.7, bluhm@ did the forward port
> >> to current. The resulting diff is below.
> >
> > I am running this di
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> based on the latest release of the Intel driver for FreeBSD (em-7.5.2),
> I've adapted the em(4) driver to support the skylake based i219
> onboard ethernet chips.
>
> I do not have access to relevant specs,
Alexander Bluhm writes:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> The diff was initially done for 5.7, bluhm@ did the forward port
>> to current. The resulting diff is below.
>
> I am running this diff with my Thinkpad T430s, no problems so far.
>
> em0 at pci0 dev
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> The diff was initially done for 5.7, bluhm@ did the forward port
> to current. The resulting diff is below.
I am running this diff with my Thinkpad T430s, no problems so far.
em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel 82579LM" rev 0x
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:35:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/02/08 13:53, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > If you own a skylake based onboard NIC, please give this diff a try.
>
> The most important bit, especially at this point in the release cycle,
> is whether it makes any cha
On 2016/02/08 13:53, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> If you own a skylake based onboard NIC, please give this diff a try.
The most important bit, especially at this point in the release cycle,
is whether it makes any changes that cause problems with other chips.
I don't have time to look closely now b
Hi everyone,
based on the latest release of the Intel driver for FreeBSD (em-7.5.2),
I've adapted the em(4) driver to support the skylake based i219
onboard ethernet chips.
I do not have access to relevant specs, everything below is
based on reading the Intel code referenced above.
The diff was
11 matches
Mail list logo
