> Miod Vallat writes:
>
> > You're right. What about the following diff? (major bump for libssl)
>
> Looks OK to me. There's also a few tendrils in regress:
Indeed. Applied, thanks!
Miod Vallat writes:
> You're right. What about the following diff? (major bump for libssl)
Looks OK to me. There's also a few tendrils in regress:
Index: ssl/ssltest.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvsync/openbsd/src/regress/lib/libssl/ssl/
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed r1.44 to t1_lib.c. I'm not sure that auditing
> opaque_prf_input is a good use of anyone's time -- I think it might be
> better to just run "unifdef -U TLSEXT_TYPE_opaque_prf_input" and be done
> with it.
>
> Here's the history of opaque_prf_input as I understand it:
>
Hello,
I just noticed r1.44 to t1_lib.c. I'm not sure that auditing
opaque_prf_input is a good use of anyone's time -- I think it might be
better to just run "unifdef -U TLSEXT_TYPE_opaque_prf_input" and be done
with it.
Here's the history of opaque_prf_input as I understand it:
- In 2006, the D
