Re: Push kernel lock inside in{,6}_control()

2022-11-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 04:52:13PM +, ssnf wrote: > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fuck First you fail to provide a proper bug report, so I couldn't help you. Now you hijack with your mail retitled "fuck", so I won't help you.

Re: Push kernel lock inside in{,6}_control()

2022-11-10 Thread ssnf
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 02:36:57PM +, ssnf wrote: > > My softraid keydisk did not get initialized during the install process. > > This fixes it. > > On 22/11/09 07:28PM, Klemens Nanni wrote: > You need to be more specific, installing to a softraid volume has always > required manual steps,

Re: Push kernel lock inside in{,6}_control()

2022-11-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:55:19AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote: > so->so_state is already read without kernel lock inside soo_ioctl() > which calls pru_control() aka in6_control() and in_control(). > > This leaves individual ioctl cases to unlock/push into. > > Feedback? OK? Now with the

Push kernel lock inside in{,6}_control()

2022-11-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
so->so_state is already read without kernel lock inside soo_ioctl() which calls pru_control() aka in6_control() and in_control(). This leaves individual ioctl cases to unlock/push into. Feedback? OK? --- sys/netinet/in.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git