off? Did the 6.5 version even work? Is Thread Local
Storage support in clang desired in general or no? Marc Espie's clang
presentation from July 2017 mentions that we do and that Mark Kettenis
helped make it happen. I'm having a hard time finding much other discussion
either way.
It wasn't turned
Marc Espie [es...@nerim.net] wrote:
>
> Thinking some more about it, I would suspect the configury stuff in that
> library to expect native support... tls doesn't work on OpenBSD unless you
> respect the toolchain.
>
> in particular, it won't fly without the support library (the emutls stuff
>
I upgraded the system to
> > OpenBSD 6.9 and TLS is no longer supported by the in-tree clang. Was this
> > intended to be turned off? Did the 6.5 version even work? Is Thread Local
> > Storage support in clang desired in general or no? Marc Espie's clang
> > presentation from July 20
ree clang. Was this
> intended to be turned off? Did the 6.5 version even work? Is Thread Local
> Storage support in clang desired in general or no? Marc Espie's clang
> presentation from July 2017 mentions that we do and that Mark Kettenis
> helped make it happen. I'm having a hard time finding
Local
Storage support in clang desired in general or no? Marc Espie's clang
presentation from July 2017 mentions that we do and that Mark Kettenis
helped make it happen. I'm having a hard time finding much other discussion
either way.
