> From: matteo filippetto
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:26:21 +0200
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a eeepc 1001pxd with "Attansic Technology L2C" working
> > and this patch didn't break the nic.
> >
> > One problem: very slow connectioncan I help?
> > try to make some tests?
> >
>
> Just an update:
> Hi,
>
> I have a eeepc 1001pxd with "Attansic Technology L2C" working
> and this patch didn't break the nic.
>
> One problem: very slow connectioncan I help?
> try to make some tests?
>
Just an update: slow connection was a problem with my AP wifi.
So my device is working well.
Thank you,
2011/5/16 Stuart Henderson :
> So far, only had reports from L1C and the new devices (which is
> not the point of sending out this sort of diff). This is a fairly
> large diff and changes behaviour for existing devices.
>
> Has anyone with a currently-working L2C tested this to make sure
> it doesn
Since nobody with a working PCI_PRODUCT_ATTANSIC_L2C seems interested,
and the devices newly added in this diff are showing up more often
in submitted dmesg than the L2C version matched by the current driver,
I intend to commit this tomorrow unless there are objections.
On 2011/05/16 11:16, Stuar
So far, only had reports from L1C and the new devices (which is
not the point of sending out this sort of diff). This is a fairly
large diff and changes behaviour for existing devices.
Has anyone with a currently-working L2C tested this to make sure
it doesn't break their nic?
On 2011/05/01 20:1
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> I have an alc device too, and would like to fix it. Starting from
> kevlo's diff I updated it some month ago to compile, and compared
> FreeBSD driver to add some more things, finding some bugs in their
> driver (reported and fixed i
On 05/02/11 14:23, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot
Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > > > I have acquired a netboot (packard be
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:02:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses
On 2011/05/02 01:16, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
> > > NIC. Is
> > > there an updated diff?
> >
> > Yes I just took
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 18:35 +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:21:16AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
> > > mostly from FreeBSD.
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:16:55AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
> > > NIC. Is
> > > there an updated diff?
> >
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 08:10:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
> > NIC. Is
> > there an updated diff?
>
> Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
> the minor
I mean... my alc0 still works...
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
>>> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this
NIC. Is
>>> there
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
>> Is
>> there an updated diff?
>
> Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
> the minor conflicts and
On 2011/05/01 18:35, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I have acquired a netboot (packard bell dot s), which I think uses this NIC.
> Is
> there an updated diff?
Yes I just took the 2 minutes it took to apply it and fix
the minor conflicts and linewrapping issue with the diff.
Untested beyond "it builds".
Te
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:21:16AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
> > mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
> > Tested on Acer AOD255E.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:24:28PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
> mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
> Tested on Acer AOD255E.
Is there an updated diff for this? It seems this never made it
into the tree.
On 01/25/11 11:24, Kevin Lo wrote:
Hi,
The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
Tested on Acer AOD255E.
Tried yesterday on EeePC 1005PX, some comments inline.
@@ -515,6 +694,20 @@ alc_attach(struct device *pare
See my comments inline.
Damien
| void
| -alc_aspm(struct alc_softc *sc)
| +alc_aspm(struct alc_softc *sc, int media)
| {
| uint32_t pmcfg;
| + uint16_t linkcfg;
|
| pmcfg = CSR_READ_4(sc, ALC_PM_CFG);
| + if ((sc->alc_flags & (ALC_FLAG_APS | ALC_FLAG_PCIE)) ==
| +
Hi,
The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets;
mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311.
Tested on Acer AOD255E.
Index: share/man/man4/alc.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/alc.4,v
retrievi
21 matches
Mail list logo