Hi Kaspars,
Kaspars Bankovskis wrote on Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 05:48:07PM +0200:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 02:33:29AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
By the way, i just grepped v6 for assert and came up empty-handed.
Anybody knows whether the statement is even correct? Didn't it
rather first appear
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 02:33:29AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
By the way, i just grepped v6 for assert and came up empty-handed.
Anybody knows whether the statement is even correct? Didn't it
rather first appear in v7?
If we can rely on the files that we get from tuhs, yes - it's not in v6,
Hi,
macro fixes, mostly.
Index: assert.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man3/assert.3,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 assert.3
--- assert.35 Jun 2013 03:42:03 - 1.8
+++ assert.36 Dec 2014 19:23:45
Hi Kaspars,
Kaspars Bankovskis wrote on Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 11:07:50PM +0200:
macro fixes, mostly.
Committed with the following exception.
Thanks,
Ingo
Index: assert.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man3/assert.3,v
The reason I changed it to 'the' was consistency. Because in previous
sentence it says 'The assert() macro', so it looks a bit weird at the
first glance. But I agree, your argument about different way of
implementing it makes sense.
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 02:33:29AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
