On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:53:28PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
> no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
> This should only affect I218 but tests on different em(4) devices would
> not hurt.
>
I will commi
spotted a small typo in a comment. 1Gpbs -> 1Gbps
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:53:28PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
> no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
> This should only affect I218 but tests on differe
On 13/10/14 5:09 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:50:45PM -0400, Brad wrote:
On 12/10/14 3:53 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
This should only affect I21
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:50:45PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> On 12/10/14 3:53 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
> >no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
> >This should only affect I218 but tests on different em(4) devi
On 12/10/14 3:53 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
This should only affect I218 but tests on different em(4) devices would
not hurt.
Chunk #3 is within the ICH8/IGP3 workarou
This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
This should only affect I218 but tests on different em(4) devices would
not hurt.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: if_em_hw.c
==
