Re: sparc64: enable dt(4) in GENERIC

2021-06-23 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:43:47 +0200 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > Similar to what has been done on x86 & arm64, ok? ok kettenis@ > Index: conf/GENERIC > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sparc64/conf/GENERIC,v > retrieving revisi

sparc64: enable dt(4) in GENERIC

2021-06-23 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Similar to what has been done on x86 & arm64, ok? Index: conf/GENERIC === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/sparc64/conf/GENERIC,v retrieving revision 1.316 diff -u -p -r1.316 GENERIC --- conf/GENERIC4 Feb 2021 16:25:39 -

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-28 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 01:11:07AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do > > > that? Number 1 rule: don't break Theo's build. > > > > One test would be to build on i

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-27 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do > > that? Number 1 rule: don't break Theo's build. > > One test would be to build on i386 (with full release process): we are > near the limit currently, so it

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/04/26 17:13, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as proposed by bluhm@ recently, this is the diff to enable dt(4) in > > GENERIC. The overhead should be small, and I have been using it on >

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hi, > > as proposed by bluhm@ recently, this is the diff to enable dt(4) in > GENERIC. The overhead should be small, and I have been using it on > arm64 to successfully debug issues for a while now. I would be

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:27:34PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:01:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > Compiled, booted, set kern.allowdt=1, created kstack on i386, amd64, > > arm64, powerpc64. > > > > does not link on armv7 > > > also missing on alpha, landisk, lun

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:01:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do > > that? Number 1 rule: don't break Theo's build. > > Compiled, booted, set kern.allowdt=1, cr

Re: enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do > that? Number 1 rule: don't break Theo's build. Compiled, booted, set kern.allowdt=1, created kstack on i386, amd64, arm64, powerpc64. does not link on armv7 ld

enable dt(4)

2021-04-26 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hi, as proposed by bluhm@ recently, this is the diff to enable dt(4) in GENERIC. The overhead should be small, and I have been using it on arm64 to successfully debug issues for a while now. I can't vouch that it builds for all architectures... Did anyone do that? Number 1 rule: don&#x