On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 02:02:49PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On July 7, 2023 12:50:55 PM GMT+02:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote:
> >> For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got.
> >> I don't like to have the
On July 7, 2023 12:50:55 PM GMT+02:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote:
>> For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got.
>> I don't like to have the whole tree on disk twice so I keep my got and CVS
>> checkouts in the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote:
> For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got.
> I don't like to have the whole tree on disk twice so I keep my got and CVS
> checkouts in the same directory.
Curious. I am not sure how well that will work in
For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got.
I don't like to have the whole tree on disk twice so I keep my got and CVS
checkouts in the same directory.
A downside of this approach is of course that got always lists all the unknown
CVS dirs in got status. Does anything speak
