On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:27:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
(...) I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have
ted.unan...@gmail.com (Ted Unangst), 2010.12.12 (Sun) 19:10 (CET):
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:36 AM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
The behaviour change in hotplug(4)/hotplugd(8) after your commit makes
it more ``hot plug'', actually. What bothers me (but not many others,
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
From: MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at
That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
would notice. :)
A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have
mark.kette...@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 13:41 (CET):
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
From: MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at
That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't think anybody
would notice. :)
A bit late to the game, but I don't really
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:28:42 +0100, MERIGHI Marcus
mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
mark.kette...@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis), 2010.12.13 (Mon) 13:41 (CET):
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:48:55 +0100
From: MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at
That sounds good. I was aware of the change, but didn't
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have configured
hotplugd(8) such that it automatically mounts things when I plug in my
camera. Now I
I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
Softraid crypto volumes take time to fsck, yet are useful to use.
In my case I can wait 20+min for my personal laptop to be useful, or I
can wait 5min and let the rest fsck while I get to be productive. The
laptop has /usr, /var, /tmp,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
Softraid crypto volumes take time to fsck, yet are useful to use.
In my case I can wait 20+min for my personal laptop to be useful, or I
can wait 5min and let the
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
I echo Mark's sentiments, though for a different reason.
And hot-pluggable serial devices, like GPS receivers. Some of them do
have usb serial numbers I can key on.
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:17:26 -0500
From: Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
A bit late to the game, but I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have configured
OK, if you can wait a few more hours, I will make a diff to go back
the way things came.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
I think the solution to that is to make adding the duid to fstab work.
At boot, if the duid exists, it's mounted. If it doesn't, it doesn't
mount but also doesn't error out. This may already work even, I
haven't
Depends, create an OpenBSD partition between mbr and 1st sector of the msdos fs,
lie and say there lies a 4.2BSD filessytem just enough to permit writing a
disklabel,
and wallah:
t...@blue/pF ~9$ sudo fdisk sd1
Disk: sd1 geometry: 248/255/63 [3987456 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:04:13PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
| I can agree there's a problem here, but the fact that you're using
| hotplug to mount disks that aren't hotplugged indicates the problem is
| elsewhere. :) I don't think hotplug was supposed to be the do random
| stuff a little bit
ted.unan...@gmail.com (Ted Unangst), 2010.12.11 (Sat) 21:54 (CET):
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
the latest modification of src/sys/dev/hotplug.c (1) changes hotplug(4)
behaviour concerning devices that are attached before the hotplug device
is
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:36 AM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
The behaviour change in hotplug(4)/hotplugd(8) after your commit makes
it more ``hot plug'', actually. What bothers me (but not many others,
obviously) is the fact that the behaviour change is undocumented. Four
places
ted.unan...@gmail.com (Ted Unangst), 2010.12.12 (Sun) 19:10 (CET):
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:36 AM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
The behaviour change in hotplug(4)/hotplugd(8) after your commit makes
it more ``hot plug'', actually. What bothers me (but not many others,
the latest modification of src/sys/dev/hotplug.c (1) changes hotplug(4)
behaviour concerning devices that are attached before the hotplug device
is opened (by hotplugd(8), for example). such devices are ignored in
hotplug.c by hotplug_put_event because of !evqueue (line 92 in -current).
since
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, MERIGHI Marcus mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
the latest modification of src/sys/dev/hotplug.c (1) changes hotplug(4)
behaviour concerning devices that are attached before the hotplug device
is opened (by hotplugd(8), for example). such devices are ignored in
19 matches
Mail list logo
