On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 05:17:55PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > First of all, thanks for looking at this, I forgot we hadn't done offloads
> > for ixl(4) yet.
>
> You're welcome.
>
> > In the case of ixl(4), the driver has to
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 05:17:55PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> First of all, thanks for looking at this, I forgot we hadn't done offloads
> for ixl(4) yet.
You're welcome.
> In the case of ixl(4), the driver has to tell the nic the length of each of
> the
> packet headers, so it should
Hi Jan,
First of all, thanks for looking at this, I forgot we hadn't done offloads
for ixl(4) yet.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:27:28PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:39:01PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 22.10.2021. 13:39, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > Thats because, you
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:39:01PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 22.10.2021. 13:39, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Thats because, you only see this flags, if the checksum offloading is
> > enabled for "sending". I'm still working/debugging on the sending side.
> > Thus, I just send a diff with the
