On July 2, 2023 2:33:41 PM GMT+02:00, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> anyone?
>
>Was not able to test yet but I like the diff.
>Right now this is a noop since LRO is not on by default for lo(4).
>Because of that OK claudio@
The diff
On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> anyone?
Was not able to test yet but I like the diff.
Right now this is a noop since LRO is not on by default for lo(4).
Because of that OK claudio@
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
anyone?
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Claudio@ mentioned the idea to use TSO and LRO on the loopback
> interface to transfer TCP faster.
>
> I see a performance effect with this diff, but more importantly it
> gives us more test coverage. Currently
Hi,
Claudio@ mentioned the idea to use TSO and LRO on the loopback
interface to transfer TCP faster.
I see a performance effect with this diff, but more importantly it
gives us more test coverage. Currently LRO on lo(4) is default
off.
Future plan is:
- Fix some corner cases for LRO/TSO with
