so something like this... ok mandoc@
Index: sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.127
diff -u -p -r1.127 isakmpd.conf.5
--- sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf.5 22 Sep 2010 13:45
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2011/06/15 10:03, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > so i guess we're looking for a text only (i.e. no example) solution.
> > > here is another stab.
> >
> > nicely c
On 15/06/2011, at 10:16 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2011/06/15 10:03, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>>> so i guess we're looking for a text only (i.e. no example) solution.
>>> here is another stab.
>>
>> nicely crafted words, this i
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/06/15 10:03, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > so i guess we're looking for a text only (i.e. no example) solution.
> > here is another stab.
>
> nicely crafted words, this is good. ok sthen@
>
> I'll handle the other copies of t
On 2011/06/15 10:03, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> so i guess we're looking for a text only (i.e. no example) solution.
> here is another stab.
nicely crafted words, this is good. ok sthen@
I'll handle the other copies of this if you like.
> Index: pf.conf.5
> =
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:37:25AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> perhaps a small number of people, but it can be a very serious
> issue indeed. particularly for pf.conf it needs to be crystal clear.
> compare output from these two:
>
> $ cat << EOF | pfctl -nvf -
> pass out quick on lan \
>
On 2011/06/15 09:18, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > You're right about it getting copied to other places, there are 9
> > copies in tree and I'd rather not come up with an example for each,
> > so I would be happier to have it in the text rather than as an
> > example if it can be done clearly, but
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:58:31PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > so i'm not fussed. i'll leave it to stuart to decide whether the example
> > is actually needed or not. i suppose if it is different to the shell, it
> > will confuse people.
>
> I think it needs to be mentioned explicitly a
On 06/14/2011 11:58 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/06/14 15:43, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
>>>
if you want to document it, i'd prefer to try and tuck it in nice and
neat, without an example. how about rearranging the
> so I would be happier to have it in the text rather than as an
> example if it can be done clearly, but I haven't managed it...
For pf and pf like code:
Notice: Line continuation processing occurs BEFORE comment removal.
For ksh and ksh like code:
Notice: Comments are removed BEFORE lin
On 2011/06/14 15:43, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > if you want to document it, i'd prefer to try and tuck it in nice and
> > > neat, without an example. how about rearranging the section to something
> > > like this:
> > >
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> >
> > if you want to document it, i'd prefer to try and tuck it in nice and
> > neat, without an example. how about rearranging the section to something
> > like this:
> >
> > Comments can be put anywhere in the file usin
On 06/14/2011 12:54 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:59:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2011/06/14 09:33, Florian Obser wrote:
>>> anyone?
>>
>> This is just how it works.
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/144553/focus=144586
>>
but doesn't exp
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:59:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/06/14 09:33, Florian Obser wrote:
> > anyone?
>
> This is just how it works.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/144553/focus=144586
>
> > > but doesn't explain the semantics of continuation lines. I don't
On 2011/06/14 09:33, Florian Obser wrote:
> anyone?
This is just how it works.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/144553/focus=144586
> > but doesn't explain the semantics of continuation lines. I don't feel
> > qualified to provide a patch for pf.conf(5).
How about this? I tried a f
anyone?
On 05/19/2011 03:31 PM, Florian Obser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature. Consider the following pf.conf:
>
> # foo
> # bar
>
> #pass out \
> pass out log \
> label "foo#bar"\
> tag "FOO#BAZ"
>
>
> pass out \
> label "foo#bar"\
> tag FOO#BAZ
>
> # /sb
16 matches
Mail list logo
