On 24 Apr 2015, at 3:39 pm, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
After updating one of my machines to a more recent snapshot I noticed that
networking speed was reduced and that the machine was 'less' responsive.
Be aware there is a fairly expensive debugging diff in the snapshots
On Fri 24/04/2015 16:25, David Gwynne wrote:
On 24 Apr 2015, at 3:39 pm, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
After updating one of my machines to a more recent snapshot I noticed that
networking speed was reduced and that the machine was 'less' responsive.
Be aware there
For future references: is it possible to see if a kernel from snapshots
contains
'non committed' code?
No.
It is rare. However the process has been a great success, so it will
be done every once in a while.
Hello,
After updating one of my machines to a more recent snapshot I noticed that
networking speed was reduced and that the machine was 'less' responsive. Quick
look in systat revealed that softnet was hammering the processor (90% interrupt
on CPU0). After reverting to a backup (older kernel) the
After updating one of my machines to a more recent snapshot I noticed that
networking speed was reduced and that the machine was 'less' responsive.
Be aware there is a fairly expensive debugging diff in the snapshots
(it is not actually commited).
