> As the kernel currently contains (at least) 1946 pointers leak by using
> printf(9) and %p, it might be more efficient to scramble %p with a
> static value (randomly assigned at boot time).
Oh come on. That proposal has no security property!
Over time we need to delete all such printf's, and l
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:25:25PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I agree, but the intent is replacing a debugging method with another
> > debugging method (hoping it is more useful). The messages showed here
> > are the same that the ones which would be shown on the console before
> > the diff.
>
