On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Federico Schwindt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:40 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
all crazy backends we
2011/7/14 David Gwynne l...@animata.net:
in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
wants to canonicalise something on the ssl backends.
noone has an opinion?
would anyone get upset if i committed this?
dlg
On 14/07/2011, at 1:40 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
all crazy backends we have. this works
On 2011-07-19 08.29, David Gwynne wrote:
noone has an opinion?
I like it. I was about to run into exactly the same problem on a
similar setup in a few days myself, so it couldn't have come in
more handy. :-)
would anyone get upset if i committed this?
I've tried the patch briefly, and it
Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-07-19 08.29, David Gwynne wrote:
noone has an opinion?
I like it. I was about to run into exactly the same problem on a
similar setup in a few days myself, so it couldn't have come in
more handy. :-)
would anyone get upset if i committed this?
I've tried
in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
wants to canonicalise something on the ssl backends. because the
ssl is done in nginx, apache doesnt
