On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 10:19:21PM +0300, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > #include
> >
> > I think is a merge bug, isn't it?
> >
> > > +#include
> > > +#include
> > >
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:49:03PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
>
> I think is a merge bug, isn't it?
>
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +#include
Right.
> > + error = tcp_if_output_tso(ifp, mp, dst, rt, ifcap, mtu);
> > +
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 08:04:11PM +0300, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> As final step before making LRO (Large Receive Offload) the default,
> we have to fix path MTU discovery when forwarding.
>
> The drivers, currently ix(4) and lo(4) only, record an upper bound
> of the size of the original packets
Hi,
As final step before making LRO (Large Receive Offload) the default,
we have to fix path MTU discovery when forwarding.
The drivers, currently ix(4) and lo(4) only, record an upper bound
of the size of the original packets in ph_mss. When sending we
must chop the packets with TSO (TCP
